From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60AD281745; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720450840; cv=none; b=sfqZV5fIbJOxmKYhblhZ/zflsubHCBnrU0Vt9kIriPFA6E8wZhOnFcjtLlrnYs0KhU46AwYDD7wHryqsYFCklpxpefDA43f7ItuLDlI1RgtQPWy7cK8CizjS/5v8+m1y52hZkm+03pmTnLMScFQkO3hr5bgLNcnEj+bsalT2Hhs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720450840; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9tWDZ4ouMiehsT9Ap8iEFsMYys+iRi1AtI6U10gq75A=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PgisXtpRaeUfDxXJzEzABWT2vfhUTyQUt8Ux230z31PPJFUBYXZRrmfbud8j2tGHYOkwPkpiphCuHEKhr4WH6GKu5KLH69XZ9lQWJbodTP9DBK5kENNTL1fHEEpx3ArgJD+V/SL86wjbYsevkZCk4mid3xgVRbyu1dgM2ScXWNs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SRRSeseX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SRRSeseX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0639AC116B1; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:00:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1720450840; bh=9tWDZ4ouMiehsT9Ap8iEFsMYys+iRi1AtI6U10gq75A=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=SRRSeseX86QpkhoGOvxnidA5zEKA1zYTMbJ9+HDGCgSyN0TMtinPbB/FThsSrLhSL BMSSQLCwIn0oeShZxtPRRltz9DHvXNv0GY5/MbKZ+lugr/ZpTmuEZSoccSDR8GvMJ/ C4ewt01hkpw/7t3GaMYtZhj4atsLRRzYErAMkPGmB/J9CVbQcQndP+GGqUOjnYGDK6 0EoiDGwMDW23b0vU5tNbieJ2DRuwg2AgWgJMKdnZPTfPbK08RR+qsUsaMQsDMvgraj Z/vPF2m1zhpVRGLE6zTKqFOxb9AUY/tIeq+G1Bcanv8x/Ij4Icif+mMIU0qmrngX2a nXDuH4IOCqURw== From: Puranjay Mohan To: Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Mykola Lysenko , Alexei Starovoitov , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Shuah Khan , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Bretelle Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: DENYLIST.aarch64: Remove fexit_sleep In-Reply-To: References: <20240705145009.32340-1-puranjay@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:00:31 +0000 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Daniel Borkmann writes: > On 7/5/24 4:50 PM, Puranjay Mohan wrote: >> fexit_sleep test runs successfully now on the CI so remove it from the >> deny list. > > Do you happen to know which commit fixed it? If yes, might be nice to have it > documented in the commit message. Actually, I never saw this test failing on my local setup and yesterday I tried running it on the CI where it passed as well. So, I assumed that this would be fixed by some commit. I am not sure which exact commit might have fixed this. Manu, Martin When this was added to the deny list was this failing every time and did you have some reproducer for this. If there is a reproducer, I can try fixing it but when ran normally this test never fails for me. Thanks, Puranjay --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIoEARYKADIWIQQ3wHGvVs/5bdl78BKwwPkjG3B2nQUCZov/EBQccHVyYW5qYXlA a2VybmVsLm9yZwAKCRCwwPkjG3B2nd39AP9EBMWza1kS6tLoAj30iwUT8Rq62Spe uPJ3oe/ze53tMQEAw96OjLRvasQ6jnDH9Igoh1iUcLlnsR6LnZ5TvEpO9gQ= =mXSa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--