From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752579AbbJFLw1 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 07:52:27 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50241 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751979AbbJFLw0 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 6 Oct 2015 07:52:26 -0400
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@samsung.com>,
        Manjeet Pawar <manjeet.p@samsung.com>,
        Rohit Thapliyal <r.thapliyal@samsung.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, pankaj.m@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM64:Fix MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ
References: <1444109743-8561-1-git-send-email-manjeet.p@samsung.com>
	<5022096.8QRzW0l3EJ@wuerfel>
	<20151006103128.GN6281@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
	<5340366.WTVksOGb0G@wuerfel> <mvmh9m48dpa.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
	<20151006113328.GP6281@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
X-Yow: Three attractive BANK ROBBERS are discussing RELIGIOUS DIFFERENCES and
 MAKE-UP TECHNIQUE with them!!
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 13:52:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20151006113328.GP6281@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (Dave Martin's
	message of "Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:33:28 +0100")
Message-ID: <mvma8rw8b9j.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:

> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:59:45PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
>> 
>> > I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition
>> > of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need,
>> > add whatever you require yourself" and SIGSTKSZ == "Should be
>> > enough for a couple of function calls".
>> 
>> The python3 testsuite wants to put two signal frames in a SIGSTKSZ
>> stack.
>
> Whether it's valid to expect SIGSTKSZ to be big enough for that is
> debatable.

This is tracked in <https://bugs.python.org/issue22503>.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."