From: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Yinghai <yinghai.lu@oracle.com>, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: Config NO_BOOTMEM breaks my amd64 box
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:43:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <n2p21d7e9971004081943qdc59e4deq315d6d06704e9f92@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100408072731.GA29866@elte.hu>
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai <yinghai.lu@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> On 04/07/2010 11:32 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >
>> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>> >
>> >> * James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 03/31/2010 04:43 PM, James Morris wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Upgraded how? The problem no longer happens?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Upgraded to the latest rawhide userland -- I have not since tested with
>> >>>>> bootmem off. I'll try and do so again when I get a chance.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> That would be great. The sooner the better, obviously.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm not seeing any problems now, with current Linus and rawhide. I'll leave
>> >>> bootmem off and see if anything comes up again.
>> >>
>> >> (a current bootlog would still be nice)
>> >>
>> >> Dave, can you reproduce any of these problems with Linus's latest?
>> >
>> > ping? Can you or Dave reproduce the bug with -rc3 or later kernels? (If not
>> > then it probably means that the bug you triggered was already fixed at the
>> > time you reported it, as hpa suspected.)
>>
>> James already reported -rc3 fix the problem for him.
>>
>> Dave implied -rc3 fixed problem for him
>
> Hm, i'm confused, does this mean that it was all fixed upstream already when
> Dave and James sent their complaints?
When I reported it, it was only at rc2 stage so not fixed upstream at all.
>
> Would be nice to have a confirmation from Dave for that (beyond 'implying'
> it), to not keep this thread open-ended.
Okay I built a linus head and it booted on the previously broken machine.
with CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y
Dave.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-09 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-31 4:49 Config NO_BOOTMEM breaks my amd64 box James Morris
2010-03-31 6:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 6:47 ` James Morris
2010-03-31 16:25 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 18:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 20:57 ` Dave Airlie
2010-03-31 21:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-31 21:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 21:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 21:14 ` Dave Airlie
2010-03-31 22:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 22:58 ` James Morris
2010-03-31 23:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 23:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 23:43 ` James Morris
2010-03-31 23:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01 1:00 ` James Morris
2010-04-01 12:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-08 6:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-08 7:00 ` Yinghai
2010-04-08 7:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-09 2:43 ` Dave Airlie [this message]
2010-04-08 8:05 ` James Morris
2010-04-08 8:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 22:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 22:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-31 22:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 22:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-04-01 0:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-31 23:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-31 23:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 0:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01 1:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 2:02 ` [PATCH -v3] nobootmem/bootmem, x86: Fix 32bit numa system without RAM on Node0 Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 3:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01 3:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 3:44 ` [PATCH -v4 1/2] nobootmem, " Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 3:45 ` [PATCH -v4 2/2] bootmem, " Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 22:57 ` [tip:x86/urgent] bootmem, x86: Fix 32bit numa system without RAM on node 0 tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-04-01 22:57 ` [tip:x86/urgent] nobootmem, " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-03-31 10:51 ` Config NO_BOOTMEM breaks my amd64 box Stefan Richter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-01 3:16 H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-01 3:35 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=n2p21d7e9971004081943qdc59e4deq315d6d06704e9f92@mail.gmail.com \
--to=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai.lu@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).