From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753685AbZAKN76 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:59:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754551AbZAKN5x (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:57:53 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:36821 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753247AbZAKN5s convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:57:48 -0500 Cc: Kernel Testers List , "Miklos Szeredi" References: In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: Subject: [Bug #12208] uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:41:02 +0100 (CET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way). Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12208 Subject : uml is very slow on 2.6.28 host Submitter : Miklos Szeredi Date : 2008-12-12 9:35 (31 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122907463518593&w=4