public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Fwd: Re: WCHAN wrong for i386-kernel
       [not found] ` <20070401183049.GA27614@elte.hu>
@ 2007-04-01 19:28   ` Gerhard Kurz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Gerhard Kurz @ 2007-04-01 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel



------- Forwarded message -------
From: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Gerhard Kurz" <gerhard.kurz@gmx.at>
Cc:
Subject: Re: WCHAN wrong for i386-kernel
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:30:49 +0200


* Gerhard Kurz <gerhard.kurz@gmx.at> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There is a minor bug in kernels for i386 (i found it in 2.6.14.2, but
> looking at the source code of 2.6.20, it should be there also).
>
> Symptom: For a task that sleeps e.g. in sys_nanosleep, the wchan value
> from get_wchan (in arch/i386/kernel/process.c) is wrong.
>
> Reason: To get the correct wchan value, all __sched functions must
> have a framepointer. Currently only the functions in kernel/sched.c
> are compiled with -fno-omit-frame-pointer. (see kernel/Makefile)
>
> But sys_nanosleep calls schedule_timeout_interruptible (in
> kernel/timer.c), which doesn't have a framepointer.

ah, indeed - nice find!

could you please report this to lkml too? It should be fixed, and by
sending it to lkml we make it sure that someone picks it up eventually,
if i dont get around fixing it in time.

	Ingo



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-04-01 19:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <op.tp37gmkkckuthk@i386.10base2.at>
     [not found] ` <20070401183049.GA27614@elte.hu>
2007-04-01 19:28   ` Fwd: Re: WCHAN wrong for i386-kernel Gerhard Kurz

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox