From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756100Ab0IGBls (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2010 21:41:48 -0400 Received: from mailout1.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.11]:31917 "EHLO mailout1.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756012Ab0IGBln convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2010 21:41:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:40:46 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBOYXphcmV3aWN6?= Subject: Re: [RFCv5 0/9] CMA + VCMM integration In-reply-to: <20100906210905.GB5863@kroah.com> To: Greg KH Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Daniel Walker , FUJITA Tomonori , Hans Verkuil , Jonathan Corbet , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , Pawel Osciak , Peter Zijlstra , Russell King , Zach Pfeffer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: Organization: Samsung Electronics MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.61 (Linux) References: <20100906210905.GB5863@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:09:05 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 08:33:50AM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> This patchset introduces a draft of a redesign of Zach Pfeffer's >> VCMM. > > What is a VCMM? Virtual Contiguous Memory Manager. The version posted by Zach can be found at: . It is an API for managing IO MMU and IO MMU mappings. > What is a CMA? Contiguous Memory Manager. The v4 version can be found at . It is an API for allocating large, physically contiguous blocks of memory. I haven't expected that anyone who haven't already participated in the discussion about CMA and VCMM will get interested by this patchset so I was a bit vague in the cover letter. Sorry about that. >> Not all of the functionality of the original VCMM has been >> ported into this patchset. This is mostly meant as RFC. Moreover, >> the code for VCMM implementation in this RFC has not been tested. > If you haven't even tested it, why should we review it? Ignore the code then and look just at the documentation, please. I wanted to post what I have to receive comments about the general idea and not necessarily the code itself. Code is just a mean to show how I see the implementation of the idea described in the documentation. Because of all that, I marked the patchset as a RFC rather than a PATCH. -- Best regards, _ _ | Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o | Computer Science, MichaƂ "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) +----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--