From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756959Ab0ITRFf (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:05:35 -0400 Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:11779 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756512Ab0ITRFe convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:05:34 -0400 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:07:28 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBOYXphcmV3aWN6?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: core: dev.c: use spin_lock_irqsave() rather than In-reply-to: <20100920.091407.241426689.davem@davemloft.net> To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, David Miller Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Message-id: Organization: Samsung Electronics Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.62 (Linux) References: <1284998621.3420.539.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20100920.091407.241426689.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:14:07 +0200, David Miller wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 18:03:41 +0200 > >> Hmm, while your patch is technically correct, it seems strange all this >> stuff runs in hard irq context. > > I would much rather this RNDIS query response handler get > scheduled to run into softirq context or similar instead. > > I am not applying this patch. Eh... I'll try to look at RNDIS than. -- Best regards, _ _ | Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) +----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo--