From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262760AbTKRNoR (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:44:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262750AbTKRNmx (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:42:53 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:5586 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262760AbTKRNmV (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:42:21 -0500 To: =?iso-8859-1?q?=C9ric?= Brunet Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com Subject: Re: status of ipchains in 2.6? References: <200310280127.h9S1RM5d002140@napali.hpl.hp.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20031028090304.GA19302@lps.ens.fr.suse.lists.linux.kernel> From: Andi Kleen Date: 28 Oct 2003 15:31:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20031028090304.GA19302@lps.ens.fr.suse.lists.linux.kernel> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Éric Brunet writes: > > In my case, 2.6.0-test4 is working fine. Can you do a binary search in the versions to see which version broke it? test5-test8 all had netfilter changes. -Andi