From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 02/2] allow gcc4 to optimize unit-at-a-time
Date: 28 Dec 2005 16:30:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p734q4tb5na.fsf@verdi.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051228114701.GC3003@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> writes:
> allow gcc4 compilers to optimize unit-at-a-time - which results in gcc
> having a wider scope when optimizing. This also results in smaller code
> when optimizing for size. (gcc4 does not have the stack footprint
> problem of gcc3 compilers.)
I never had any trouble with stack footprint even with gcc 3.3 on x86-64
and unit-at-a-time and it was always enabled.
But one caveat: turning on unit-at-a-time makes objdump -S / make
foo/bar.lst with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO essentially useless because objdump
cannot deal with functions being out of order in the object file. This
can be a big problem while analyzing oopses - essentially you have
to analyze the functions without source level information. And with
unit-at-a-time they become bigger so it's more difficult.
But I still think it's a good idea.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-28 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-28 11:47 [patch 02/2] allow gcc4 to optimize unit-at-a-time Ingo Molnar
2005-12-28 12:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-12-28 12:28 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-12-28 13:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
2005-12-28 12:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-12-28 12:50 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-12-28 13:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-28 15:30 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-12-28 15:34 ` Matt Mackall
2005-12-28 15:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-28 17:46 ` Andreas Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p734q4tb5na.fsf@verdi.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox