From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750777AbWH1Q1t (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:27:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751149AbWH1Q1t (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:27:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:5292 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750777AbWH1Q1s (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:27:48 -0400 To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, mingo@elte.hu, jesse.barnes@intel.com, dwalker@mvista.com, andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] maximum latency tracking infrastructure (version 3) References: <1156780080.3034.207.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060828161145.GA25161@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> <44F3178F.8010508@linux.intel.com> From: Andi Kleen Date: 28 Aug 2006 18:27:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <44F3178F.8010508@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven writes: > > I could have sworn there was an idle call notifier already\ > > ah there is on x86-64 but it is architecture specific... The original implementation was on s390. But they're not really designed for doing anything slow, so I wouldn't recommend using them in drivers unless it's very fast. -Andi