From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752710AbYARFAr (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750747AbYARFAk (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:40 -0500 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:57797 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750712AbYARFAj (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:39 -0500 To: Harvey Harrison Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , LKML , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: add is_f00f_bug helper to fault_32|64.c From: Andi Kleen References: <1200610456.5724.41.camel@brick> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:00:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1200610456.5724.41.camel@brick> (Harvey Harrison's message of "Thu\, 17 Jan 2008 14\:54\:16 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Harvey Harrison writes: > Further towards unifying these files, add another helper > in same spirit as is_errata93. The better way to handle this would be to move all these workarounds into notifiers that only get registered on the CPUs that actually have the bugs. There is right now no die notifier in the right place for this, but you could just add one there. This is no performance critical place. -Andi