From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@osdl.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: swsusp status report
Date: 26 Jul 2006 17:13:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73fygo5ri9.fsf@verdi.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200607251325.14747.rjw@sisk.pl>
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> The code that restores the memory state from the suspend image in step
> (11) also uses the kernel identity mapping to address memory, so it cannot
> access highmem pages on i386, but it practically has no other limitations as
> far as the image size is concerned. In other words, it would be possible to
> restore suspend images as big as 80% or even 90% of RAM, or the normal zone
> on i386, if the 'snapshotting' code were able to create them.
Why can't you just kmap or ioremap them as needed and pass the pfns/struct
page * for IO?
> The code that performs steps (5) and (11) of the suspend-resume cycle is
> quite robust and there is only one known problem with it, which seems to
> be x86_64-specific. Namely, on x86_64 machines with more than 2 GB of RAM
> there are memory gaps and/or reserved memory areas between the 2nd and 3rd
> Gbyte of physical memory and swsusp tries to save these areas as though
> they were RAM which leads to oopses. This issue is now being worked on.
I guess we could just borrow a new struct page flags bit again and set it
during memory setup. That would fix your problem I guess. Should be fairly
easy to do. Let me know if you need it.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-26 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-25 11:25 swsusp status report Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-07-25 15:11 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-25 19:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-07-26 10:08 ` Pavel Machek
2006-07-26 15:13 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-07-26 17:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p73fygo5ri9.fsf@verdi.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@osdl.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox