From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, giri@lmc.cs.sunysb.edu
Subject: Re: __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC causes 'sleeping from invalid context'
Date: 22 May 2006 13:18:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73fyj271fp.fsf@verdi.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <447119B3.7000506@yahoo.com.au>
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> writes:
> Giridhar Pemmasani wrote:
> > If __vmalloc is called in atomic context with GFP_ATOMIC flags,
> > __get_vm_area_node is called, which calls kmalloc_node with GFP_KERNEL
> > flags. This causes 'sleeping function called from invalid context at
> > mm/slab.c:2729' with 2.6.16-rc4 kernel. A simple solution is to use
>
> I can't see what would cause this in either 2.6.16-rc4 or 2.6.17-rc4.
> What is the line?
>
> > proper flags in __get_vm_area_node, depending on the context:
>
> I don't think that always works, you might pass in GFP_ATOMIC due to
> having hold of a spinlock, for example.
>
> Also, vmlist_lock isn't interrupt safe, so it still kind of goes
> against the spirit of GFP_ATOMIC (which is to allow allocation from
> interrupt context).
That's not the only problem. Allocating page table entries or flushing TLBs from
an atomic context is just not supported by the low level architecture code.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-22 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-22 1:36 __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC causes 'sleeping from invalid context' Giridhar Pemmasani
2006-05-22 1:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-22 6:01 ` Giridhar Pemmasani
2006-05-22 1:53 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-22 5:58 ` Giridhar Pemmasani
2006-05-22 6:07 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-22 6:10 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-22 6:14 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-22 7:08 ` Giridhar Pemmasani
2006-05-22 7:34 ` Nick Piggin
2006-05-22 14:55 ` Giridhar Pemmasani
2006-05-22 6:56 ` Giridhar Pemmasani
2006-05-22 21:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-22 22:59 ` Giridhar Pemmasani
2006-05-22 11:18 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2006-05-22 15:12 ` Giridhar Pemmasani
2006-05-22 11:47 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-23 6:13 Giridhar Pemmasani
2006-10-23 10:38 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-23 11:11 ` Giridhar Pemmasani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p73fyj271fp.fsf@verdi.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=giri@lmc.cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox