From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: Reducing debuginfo size by removing unneeded includes
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:12:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73ir0mxvby.fsf@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080207230304.GA4352@ghostprotocols.net> (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo's message of "Thu\, 7 Feb 2008 21\:03\:04 -0200")
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> writes:
>
> [acme@doppio net-2.6]$ l /tmp/sys_ia32.o.before /tmp/sys_ia32.o.after
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 acme acme 185240 2008-02-06 19:19 /tmp/sys_ia32.o.after
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 acme acme 248328 2008-02-06 19:00 /tmp/sys_ia32.o.before
>
> Almost 64KB only on this object file!
Just FYI, newer gcc does this in theory automatically when you specify
-feliminate-unused-debug-types -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols
But in my tests on gcc 4.1 / gcc 4.2 it doesn't seem to make any difference
currently :/ Not sure what is wrong.
There is also -feliminate-dwarf2-dups, but it seems to even increase
obj dir size. Also -feliminate-dwarf2-dups seems to generate a lot of
WARNING: vmlinux.o (.gnu.linkonce.wi.mmzone.h.97561702): unexpected section name.
The (.[number]+) following section name are ld generated and not expected.
Did you forget to use "ax"/"aw" in a .S file?
Note that for example <linux/init.h> contains
section definitions for use in .S files.
etc. warnings But the kernel builds fine even with those warnings.
Still if you just want to shrink objdir size then figuring out
what's wrong with these options and then specifying them would be
probably the best strategy than to try to do it all manually.
That said removing unused includes is of course a valuable
clean up by itself, I'm just not sure it's the best way to get
smaller object dirs.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-18 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-07 23:03 Reducing debuginfo size by removing unneeded includes Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-02-17 14:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-02-18 5:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-18 13:12 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-02-18 13:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-02-18 14:50 ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-18 14:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-02-18 14:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-24 7:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-24 8:25 ` Samuel Tardieu
2008-02-24 9:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-02-24 12:23 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p73ir0mxvby.fsf@bingen.suse.de \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox