From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760911AbXIMJnd (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 05:43:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758484AbXIMJnX (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 05:43:23 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:49382 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758296AbXIMJnW (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 05:43:22 -0400 To: Reza Roboubi Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: TCP_LINGER2 TIME_WAIT References: <46E8B491.2080107@parvan.net> From: Andi Kleen Date: 13 Sep 2007 11:43:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <46E8B491.2080107@parvan.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reza Roboubi writes: > man 7 tcp says TCP_LINGER2 sets the lifetime of orphaned FIN_WAIT2 state > sockets. What about wanting to forcibly kill a "rotten" TCP socket in > any other "WAIT" state like TIME_WAIT? The whole point of TIME-WAIT is catching old packets still in network. Killing it early would avoid its purpose. -Andi