From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:02:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:02:07 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:6415 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:02:06 -0400 To: Bendi Vinaya Kumar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Skbuff Trimming References: From: Andi Kleen Date: 28 Jun 2002 05:04:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: Bendi Vinaya Kumar's message of "28 Jun 2002 00:16:41 +0200" Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bendi Vinaya Kumar writes: > But, it does not do the same on > "frag_list". Why? frag_list is not a general purpose skbuff facility and is not used by most protocols and not directly supported by most of skbuff.c It is just supported by some specific paths to enable lazy defragmenting. It is not an attempt to turn skbuffs into mbufs. -Andi