From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: dor.laor@qumranet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:27:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73lk81nw71.fsf@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <475E8C8B.7070308@qumranet.com> (Dor Laor's message of "Tue\, 11 Dec 2007 15\:11\:39 +0200")
[headers rewritten because of gmane crosspost breakage]
> In the latest kernel (2.6.24-rc3) I noticed a drastic performance
> decrease for KVM networking.
That should not have changed for quite some time.
Also it depends on the CPU of course.
> The reason is many vmexit (exit reason is cpuid instruction) caused by
> calls to gettimeofday that uses tsc sourceclock.
> read_tsc calls get_cycles_sync which might call cpuid in order to
> serialize the cpu.
>
> Can you explain why the cpu needs to be serialized for every gettime call?
Otherwise RDTSC can be speculated around and happen outside the protection
of the seqlock and that can sometimes lead to non monotonic time reporting.
Anyways after a lot of discussions it turns out there are ways to archive
this without CPUID and there is a solution implemented for this in ff
tree which I will submit for .25. It's a little complicated though
and not a quick fix.
> Do we need to be that accurate? (It will also slightly improve physical
> hosts).
> I believe you have a reason and the answer is yes. In that case can you
> replace the serializing instruction
> with an instruction that does not trigger vmexit? Maybe use 'ltr' for
> example?
ltr doesn't synchronize RDTSC.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-11 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-11 13:11 Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync Dor Laor
2007-12-11 13:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-11 14:14 ` Dor Laor
[not found] ` <475E9A92.4030001@qumranet.com>
2007-12-11 14:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-11 15:03 ` Dor Laor
2007-12-11 16:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-11 17:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-11 17:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-12-11 20:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-11 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-11 21:26 ` [kvm-devel] " Joerg Roedel
2007-12-11 14:27 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-12-11 14:57 ` Dor Laor
2007-12-11 15:02 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p73lk81nw71.fsf@bingen.suse.de \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dor.laor@qumranet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox