public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
	Steven Pratt <slpratt@austin.ibm.com>,
	Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] on-demand readahead
Date: 25 Apr 2007 16:37:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73odlc34ga.fsf@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <377506695.54393@ustc.edu.cn>

Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@gmail.com> writes:

> OVERHEADS
> 
> The new code reduced the overheads of
> 
> 	- excessively calling the readahead routine on small sized reads
> 	  (the current readahead code insists on seeing all requests)
> 
> 	- doing a lot of pointless page-cache lookups for small cached files
> 	  (the current readahead only turns itself off after 256 cache hits,
> 	  unfortunately most files are < 1MB, so never see that chance)

Would it make sense to keep track in the AS if the file is completely in cache?
Then you could probably avoid a lot of these lookups for small in cache files

> --- linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm1.orig/mm/readahead.c
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc7-mm1/mm/readahead.c
> @@ -733,6 +733,11 @@ unsigned long max_sane_readahead(unsigne

Quite simple patch, why is it that much simpler than your earlier patchkits?
Or is that on top of them?

You seem to have a lot of magic numbers. They probably all need symbols and 
explanations.

Your white space also needs some work.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-25 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20070425131133.GA26863@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-04-25 13:11 ` [RFC][PATCH] on-demand readahead Fengguang Wu
2007-04-25 14:37   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
     [not found]     ` <20070425160400.GA27954@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-04-25 16:04       ` Fengguang Wu
2007-04-26  6:58         ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-25 16:08       ` Andi Kleen
     [not found]         ` <20070426011655.GA6373@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-04-26  1:16           ` Fengguang Wu
2007-05-02 10:02             ` [RFC] splice() and readahead interaction Eric Dumazet
     [not found]               ` <f6b15c890705050204l11045ba3w66c8c4ae0ac3407f@mail.gmail.com>
2007-05-07 21:54                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-10 19:53                 ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=p73odlc34ga.fsf@bingen.suse.de \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=slpratt@austin.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox