From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: David Weinehall <david@southpole.se>
Cc: Dax Kelson <dax@gurulabs.com>,
Peter Nelson <pnelson@andrew.cmu.edu>,
Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, ext3-users@redhat.com,
jfs-discussion@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com,
reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3
Date: 03 Mar 2004 03:39:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73ptbu4psx.fsf@brahms.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040303014115.GP19111@khan.acc.umu.se.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
David Weinehall <david@southpole.se> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:30:32PM -0500, Andrew Ho wrote:
> > XFS is the best filesystem.
>
> Well it'd better be, it's 10 times the size of ext3, 5 times the size of
> ReiserFS and 3.5 times the size of JFS.
I think your ext3 numbers are off, most likely you didn't include JBD.
> And people say size doesn't matter.
A lot of this is actually optional features the other FS don't have,
like support for separate realtime volumes and compat code for old
revisions, journaled quotas etc. I think you could
relatively easily do a "mini xfs" that would be a lot smaller.
But on today's machines it's not really an issue anymore.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-03 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-02 4:46 Desktop Filesystem Benchmarks in 2.6.3 Peter Nelson
2004-03-02 7:23 ` Hans Reiser
2004-03-02 16:34 ` Peter Nelson
2004-03-02 22:33 ` Dax Kelson
2004-03-02 22:47 ` David Weinehall
2004-03-03 1:30 ` Andrew Ho
2004-03-03 1:41 ` David Weinehall
[not found] ` <20040303014115.GP19111@khan.acc.umu.se.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-03-03 2:39 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-03-03 7:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-03-03 8:03 ` Hans Reiser
2004-03-03 8:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-03 9:35 ` Hans Reiser
2004-03-03 6:00 ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-03-03 9:43 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-03-03 9:59 ` Robin Rosenberg
2004-03-03 10:19 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-03-04 9:28 ` Kristian Köhntopp
2004-03-05 1:59 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2004-03-03 10:24 ` Mike Gigante
2004-03-03 13:14 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-03-03 14:16 ` Hans Reiser
2004-03-03 13:42 ` Hans Reiser
2004-03-03 10:13 ` Olaf Frączyk
2004-03-03 13:07 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2004-03-04 14:37 ` [Jfs-discussion] " Pascal Gienger
2004-03-04 20:43 ` Per Andreas Buer
2004-03-03 6:30 ` Hans Reiser
2004-03-03 23:41 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2004-03-05 18:46 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-06 0:16 ` Chris Mason
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-02 17:11 Ray Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p73ptbu4psx.fsf@brahms.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=david@southpole.se \
--cc=dax@gurulabs.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ext3-users@redhat.com \
--cc=jfs-discussion@www-124.southbury.usf.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=pnelson@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox