The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: "Dan Merillat" <dan.merillat@gmail.com>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name>
Subject: Re: reset during bootup - solved
Date: 12 Aug 2007 16:03:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73wsw0j1er.fsf@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a56dfcf00708120244x3ae8f4w9183354cf5f33f93@mail.gmail.com>

"Dan Merillat" <dan.merillat@gmail.com> writes:

> On 8/11/07, Dan Merillat <dan.merillat@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This one is going to be fun, since it's a hard reset back to bios, no
> > OOPS or anything shown.  It may be about the time RadeonFB kicks in,
> > but it's impossible to tell.  I'd guess 15-20 lines into dmesg.
> >
> > I'm in the process of bisecting, currently 94c18227..d23cf676.
> >
> > Any guesses of a specific patch to check?
> 
> Except it's not d23cf676, that was the version I was running while
> building HEAD, whoops.
> I'm used to monotonic version numbers, not SHA hashes.  I'll keep
> better track next time.
> 
> For completeness, the commit that caused boot to fail was:
> 
> commit ab144f5ec64c42218a555ec1dbde6b60cf2982d6
> Author: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

BTW the patch was actually from Rusty, not me, just the From 
line got lost somewhere. I did a few changes though because
the initial version didn't work on x86-64 at all. Submitted
one worked for me.

> Date:   Fri Aug 10 22:31:03 2007 +0200
> 
>     i386: Make patching more robust, fix paravirt issue
> 
> Except I'm using x86_64?  So not sure why that one rev kills me.

The code is used on x86-64 too, but the script that generates
the prefixes doesn't know this (perhaps I should drop them) 

> ACPI? It dies right after the CPU is identified:
> CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ stepping 00
> ACPI: Core revision 20070126

Ok that settles it.

However I must say I'm still dubious of Petr's patch. If there
is something wrong with alternative() then it must be fixed
in alternative() not the call sites. Otherwise it could hit
other patch sites too. There are other copies who
use a similar patching pattern.

Can people who see a failure please send me .config and 
arch/x86_64/lib/memcpy.o privately ? 

-Andi

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-12 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-12  9:44 reset during bootup - solved Dan Merillat
2007-08-12 11:09 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-12 14:03 ` Andi Kleen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=p73wsw0j1er.fsf@bingen.suse.de \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dan.merillat@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petr@vandrovec.name \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox