From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933545AbcBBREm (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:04:42 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53678 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932726AbcBBREl (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:04:41 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Holger =?iso-8859-1?q?Hoffst=E4tte?= Subject: Re: Isn't 4.4 long term stable? Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:04:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pd953e664.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 22:09:38 +0530, Ani Sinha wrote: > kernel.org lists linux 4.4.1 as "stable" but the releases page lists > it as a long term stable kernel. Which one is true? Both :) 4.4.1 is the *current* stable release and will be labeled LTS when 4.5.1 is released. It has been this way for quite some time now. -h