public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] rseq/selftests: add __rseq_abi misalignment check
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 15:27:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <patch.git-4d215e14e001.your-ad-here.call-01533561863-ext-2109@work.hours> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.thread-5c3a1c.your-ad-here.call-01533555685-ext-8699@work.hours>

The kernel rseq syscall expects that struct rseq is 32 bytes aligned and
returns EINVAL otherwise. Even though __rseq_abi is declared as static
and proper aligned attribute is present __rseq_abi is a part of thread
local storage. It turns out that on some platforms TLS itself is not
properly aligned (at least for threads created), which is a glibc nptl
bug and should be eventually fixed and backported. But in a meanwhile
add __rseq_abi misalignment check, which would detect this situation
and skip rseq test with some user friendly message.

glibc bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403

Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c           | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh  |  4 ++--
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
index 4847e97ed049..3de7f0e7442e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c
@@ -64,6 +64,24 @@ static int sys_rseq(volatile struct rseq *rseq_abi, uint32_t rseq_len,
 	return syscall(__NR_rseq, rseq_abi, rseq_len, flags, sig);
 }
 
+/*
+ * rseq syscall might fail on some platforms due to wrong alignment of TLS
+ * variables:
+ * https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403
+ *
+ * check if glibc bug is present and skip the test in this case
+ */
+static void assert_rseq_abi_aligned(void)
+{
+	if ((unsigned long)&__rseq_abi & (__alignof__(__rseq_abi) - 1)) {
+		fputs("__rseq_abi is not properly aligned, which is a known\n"
+		      "glibc nptl bug (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23403).\n"
+		      "You need a fixed version of glibc to run this test.\n",
+		      stderr);
+		exit(4); /* skip this test */
+	}
+}
+
 int rseq_register_current_thread(void)
 {
 	int rc, ret = 0;
@@ -72,6 +90,7 @@ int rseq_register_current_thread(void)
 	signal_off_save(&oldset);
 	if (refcount++)
 		goto end;
+	assert_rseq_abi_aligned();
 	rc = sys_rseq(&__rseq_abi, sizeof(struct rseq), 0, RSEQ_SIG);
 	if (!rc) {
 		assert(rseq_current_cpu_raw() >= 0);
@@ -94,6 +113,7 @@ int rseq_unregister_current_thread(void)
 	signal_off_save(&oldset);
 	if (--refcount)
 		goto end;
+	assert_rseq_abi_aligned();
 	rc = sys_rseq(&__rseq_abi, sizeof(struct rseq),
 		      RSEQ_FLAG_UNREGISTER, RSEQ_SIG);
 	if (!rc)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
index 3acd6d75ff9f..56caf5e3de3e 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ function do_tests()
 	local i=0
 	while [ "$i" -lt "${#TEST_LIST[@]}" ]; do
 		echo "Running test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
-		./param_test ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
+		./param_test ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit $?
 		echo "Running compare-twice test ${TEST_NAME[$i]}"
-		./param_test_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit 1
+		./param_test_compare_twice ${TEST_LIST[$i]} -r ${REPS} ${@} ${EXTRA_ARGS} || exit $?
 		let "i++"
 	done
 }
-- 
2.18.0.13.gd42ae10


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-06 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-06 11:47 [PATCH 0/1] rseq/selftests: add __rseq_abi misalignment check Vasily Gorbik
2018-08-06 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Vasily Gorbik
2018-08-06 13:27 ` Vasily Gorbik [this message]
2018-08-06 14:09   ` [PATCH v2 " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-07 22:22 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=patch.git-4d215e14e001.your-ad-here.call-01533561863-ext-2109@work.hours \
    --to=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox