* [PATCH v4] char/nvram: Remove redundant nvram_mutex @ 2026-03-30 10:35 Venkat Rao Bagalkote 2026-03-31 1:49 ` Ritesh Harjani 2026-04-02 16:03 ` Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Venkat Rao Bagalkote @ 2026-03-30 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: linux-kbuild, linuxppc-dev, maddy, ritesh.list, arnd, Christophe Leroy, Venkat Rao Bagalkote The global nvram_mutex in drivers/char/nvram.c is redundant and unused, and this triggers compiler warnings on some configurations. All platform-specific nvram operations already provide their own internal synchronization, meaning the wrapper-level mutex does not provide any additional safety. Remove the nvram_mutex definition along with all remaining lock/unlock users across PPC32, x86, and m68k code paths, and rely entirely on the per-architecture nvram implementations for locking. Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com> --- v4: - Remove all remaining nvram_mutex call sites, completing the mutex removal v3: - Removed global nvram_mutex definition drivers/char/nvram.c | 16 +++------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/nvram.c b/drivers/char/nvram.c index 9eff426a9286..e89cc1f1c89e 100644 --- a/drivers/char/nvram.c +++ b/drivers/char/nvram.c @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ #include <asm/nvram.h> #endif -static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvram_mutex); static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nvram_state_lock); static int nvram_open_cnt; /* #times opened */ static int nvram_open_mode; /* special open modes */ @@ -310,11 +309,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, break; #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 case IOC_NVRAM_SYNC: - if (ppc_md.nvram_sync != NULL) { - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); + if (ppc_md.nvram_sync) ppc_md.nvram_sync(); - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); - } ret = 0; break; #endif @@ -324,11 +320,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) return -EACCES; - if (arch_nvram_ops.initialize != NULL) { - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); + if (arch_nvram_ops.initialize) ret = arch_nvram_ops.initialize(); - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); - } break; case NVRAM_SETCKS: /* just set checksum, contents unchanged (maybe useful after @@ -336,11 +329,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) return -EACCES; - if (arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum != NULL) { - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); + if (arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum) ret = arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum(); - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); - } break; #endif /* CONFIG_X86 || CONFIG_M68K */ } -- 2.45.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] char/nvram: Remove redundant nvram_mutex 2026-03-30 10:35 [PATCH v4] char/nvram: Remove redundant nvram_mutex Venkat Rao Bagalkote @ 2026-03-31 1:49 ` Ritesh Harjani 2026-04-02 16:03 ` Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2026-03-31 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Venkat Rao Bagalkote, linux-kernel Cc: linux-kbuild, linuxppc-dev, maddy, arnd, Christophe Leroy, Venkat Rao Bagalkote Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com> writes: > The global nvram_mutex in drivers/char/nvram.c is redundant and unused, > and this triggers compiler warnings on some configurations. > > All platform-specific nvram operations already provide their own internal > synchronization, meaning the wrapper-level mutex does not provide any > additional safety. > > Remove the nvram_mutex definition along with all remaining lock/unlock > users across PPC32, x86, and m68k code paths, and rely entirely on the > per-architecture nvram implementations for locking. > > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Signed-off-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com> > --- > v4: > - Remove all remaining nvram_mutex call sites, completing the mutex removal > Let me cut paste the review from Sashiko here.. Does this removal expose the underlying raw spinlock to concurrent userspace contention? Looking at ppc_md.nvram_sync() implementations like core99_nvram_sync() on PowerMac, the code acquires a raw spinlock (nv_lock) and performs hardware flash memory operations with polling loops and udelay() calls that can take hundreds of milliseconds to complete. Because IOC_NVRAM_SYNC does not require CAP_SYS_ADMIN, any user with access to the device can call this ioctl. Previously, nvram_mutex provided a sleepable barrier for concurrent IOC_NVRAM_SYNC callers. Without it, won't secondary callers spin on the raw spinlock with interrupts disabled for the entire duration of the first caller's slow flash I/O? Could this prolonged spinning with IRQs disabled completely freeze the waiting CPUs and trigger NMI watchdog timeouts or system lockups? First of all the above problem is only being talked about PowerMAC and not for x86 / m68k. In there I think, we just read/write few bytes under the spinlock. On PowerMac too, I don't think the above problem gives a reason, to keep a redundant locking at a generic wrapper layer which can affects other platforms/archs. And the comment in PowerMac code above nv_lock says: // XXX Turn that into a sem static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(nv_lock); So, it looks like Sashiko review comment can be ignored, and the patch looks right to me, which kills the redundant mutex lock from here. So as for this patch please feel free to add... Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> ... But I would also let Chrisptophe comment from ppc32 / PowerMac perspective. -ritesh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] char/nvram: Remove redundant nvram_mutex 2026-03-30 10:35 [PATCH v4] char/nvram: Remove redundant nvram_mutex Venkat Rao Bagalkote 2026-03-31 1:49 ` Ritesh Harjani @ 2026-04-02 16:03 ` Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna 2026-04-07 6:41 ` Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna @ 2026-04-02 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, Venkat Rao Bagalkote Cc: linux-kbuild, linuxppc-dev, maddy, ritesh.list, arnd, Christophe Leroy On 30/03/26 4:05 pm, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote: > The global nvram_mutex in drivers/char/nvram.c is redundant and unused, > and this triggers compiler warnings on some configurations. > > All platform-specific nvram operations already provide their own internal > synchronization, meaning the wrapper-level mutex does not provide any > additional safety. > > Remove the nvram_mutex definition along with all remaining lock/unlock > users across PPC32, x86, and m68k code paths, and rely entirely on the > per-architecture nvram implementations for locking. > > Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > Signed-off-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com> > --- Without Fix =============== make -j 33 -s && make modules_install && make install In file included from ./include/linux/seqlock.h:20, from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:17, from ./include/linux/gfp.h:7, from ./include/linux/umh.h:4, from ./include/linux/kmod.h:9, from ./include/linux/module.h:18, from drivers/char/nvram.c:34: drivers/char/nvram.c:56:21: warning: 'nvram_mutex' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] 56 | static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvram_mutex); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/mutex.h:87:22: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_MUTEX' 87 | struct mutex mutexname = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) | ^~~~~~~~~ With this patch issue is fixed Please add below tag yeswanth <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com> Thanks, Yeswanth Krishna > v4: > - Remove all remaining nvram_mutex call sites, completing the mutex removal > > v3: > - Removed global nvram_mutex definition > > drivers/char/nvram.c | 16 +++------------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/nvram.c b/drivers/char/nvram.c > index 9eff426a9286..e89cc1f1c89e 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/nvram.c > +++ b/drivers/char/nvram.c > @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ > #include <asm/nvram.h> > #endif > > -static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvram_mutex); > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nvram_state_lock); > static int nvram_open_cnt; /* #times opened */ > static int nvram_open_mode; /* special open modes */ > @@ -310,11 +309,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, > break; > #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 > case IOC_NVRAM_SYNC: > - if (ppc_md.nvram_sync != NULL) { > - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); > + if (ppc_md.nvram_sync) > ppc_md.nvram_sync(); > - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); > - } > ret = 0; > break; > #endif > @@ -324,11 +320,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, > if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > return -EACCES; > > - if (arch_nvram_ops.initialize != NULL) { > - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); > + if (arch_nvram_ops.initialize) > ret = arch_nvram_ops.initialize(); > - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); > - } > break; > case NVRAM_SETCKS: > /* just set checksum, contents unchanged (maybe useful after > @@ -336,11 +329,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, > if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > return -EACCES; > > - if (arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum != NULL) { > - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); > + if (arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum) > ret = arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum(); > - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); > - } > break; > #endif /* CONFIG_X86 || CONFIG_M68K */ > } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] char/nvram: Remove redundant nvram_mutex 2026-04-02 16:03 ` Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna @ 2026-04-07 6:41 ` Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna 2026-04-07 9:02 ` Venkat 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna @ 2026-04-07 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, Venkat Rao Bagalkote Cc: linux-kbuild, linuxppc-dev, maddy, ritesh.list, arnd, Christophe Leroy Please add this tag Tested-by: yeswanth <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com> On 02/04/26 9:33 pm, Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna wrote: > > On 30/03/26 4:05 pm, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote: >> The global nvram_mutex in drivers/char/nvram.c is redundant and unused, >> and this triggers compiler warnings on some configurations. >> >> All platform-specific nvram operations already provide their own >> internal >> synchronization, meaning the wrapper-level mutex does not provide any >> additional safety. >> >> Remove the nvram_mutex definition along with all remaining lock/unlock >> users across PPC32, x86, and m68k code paths, and rely entirely on the >> per-architecture nvram implementations for locking. >> >> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> Signed-off-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com> >> --- > Without Fix > =============== > make -j 33 -s && make modules_install && make install > In file included from ./include/linux/seqlock.h:20, > from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:17, > from ./include/linux/gfp.h:7, > from ./include/linux/umh.h:4, > from ./include/linux/kmod.h:9, > from ./include/linux/module.h:18, > from drivers/char/nvram.c:34: > drivers/char/nvram.c:56:21: warning: 'nvram_mutex' defined but not > used [-Wunused-variable] > 56 | static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvram_mutex); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > ./include/linux/mutex.h:87:22: note: in definition of macro > 'DEFINE_MUTEX' > 87 | struct mutex mutexname = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) > | ^~~~~~~~~ > > > > > With this patch issue is fixed > > > Please add below tag > > yeswanth <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com> > > > Thanks, > > Yeswanth Krishna > >> v4: >> - Remove all remaining nvram_mutex call sites, completing the >> mutex removal >> >> v3: >> - Removed global nvram_mutex definition >> >> drivers/char/nvram.c | 16 +++------------- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/char/nvram.c b/drivers/char/nvram.c >> index 9eff426a9286..e89cc1f1c89e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/char/nvram.c >> +++ b/drivers/char/nvram.c >> @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ >> #include <asm/nvram.h> >> #endif >> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvram_mutex); >> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nvram_state_lock); >> static int nvram_open_cnt; /* #times opened */ >> static int nvram_open_mode; /* special open modes */ >> @@ -310,11 +309,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, >> unsigned int cmd, >> break; >> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 >> case IOC_NVRAM_SYNC: >> - if (ppc_md.nvram_sync != NULL) { >> - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); >> + if (ppc_md.nvram_sync) >> ppc_md.nvram_sync(); >> - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); >> - } >> ret = 0; >> break; >> #endif >> @@ -324,11 +320,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, >> unsigned int cmd, >> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) >> return -EACCES; >> - if (arch_nvram_ops.initialize != NULL) { >> - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); >> + if (arch_nvram_ops.initialize) >> ret = arch_nvram_ops.initialize(); >> - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); >> - } >> break; >> case NVRAM_SETCKS: >> /* just set checksum, contents unchanged (maybe useful after >> @@ -336,11 +329,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, >> unsigned int cmd, >> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) >> return -EACCES; >> - if (arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum != NULL) { >> - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); >> + if (arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum) >> ret = arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum(); >> - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); >> - } >> break; >> #endif /* CONFIG_X86 || CONFIG_M68K */ >> } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4] char/nvram: Remove redundant nvram_mutex 2026-04-07 6:41 ` Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna @ 2026-04-07 9:02 ` Venkat 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Venkat @ 2026-04-07 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: arnd, Madhavan Srinivasan Cc: linux-kernel, linux-kbuild, linuxppc-dev, maddy, ritesh.list, arnd, Christophe Leroy > On 7 Apr 2026, at 12:11 PM, Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > Please add this tag > > > Tested-by: yeswanth <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com> > > On 02/04/26 9:33 pm, Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna wrote: >> >> On 30/03/26 4:05 pm, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote: >>> The global nvram_mutex in drivers/char/nvram.c is redundant and unused, >>> and this triggers compiler warnings on some configurations. >>> >>> All platform-specific nvram operations already provide their own internal >>> synchronization, meaning the wrapper-level mutex does not provide any >>> additional safety. >>> >>> Remove the nvram_mutex definition along with all remaining lock/unlock >>> users across PPC32, x86, and m68k code paths, and rely entirely on the >>> per-architecture nvram implementations for locking. >>> >>> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>> Signed-off-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com> >>> --- Hi Arnd, Thanks for the earlier review and suggestion on this change. I’m not entirely sure which tree would be the best home for this patch, given that the change touches common NVRAM code used across multiple architectures (PPC32, x86, and m68k). If there are no further comments or objections from others, would you be able to pick this up through your tree? Please let me know if this should instead go via some other tree or maintainer. Regards, Venkat. >> Without Fix >> =============== >> make -j 33 -s && make modules_install && make install >> In file included from ./include/linux/seqlock.h:20, >> from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:17, >> from ./include/linux/gfp.h:7, >> from ./include/linux/umh.h:4, >> from ./include/linux/kmod.h:9, >> from ./include/linux/module.h:18, >> from drivers/char/nvram.c:34: >> drivers/char/nvram.c:56:21: warning: 'nvram_mutex' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] >> 56 | static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvram_mutex); >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> ./include/linux/mutex.h:87:22: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_MUTEX' >> 87 | struct mutex mutexname = __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) >> | ^~~~~~~~~ >> >> >> >> >> With this patch issue is fixed >> >> >> Please add below tag >> >> yeswanth <yeswanth@linux.ibm.com> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Yeswanth Krishna >> >>> v4: >>> - Remove all remaining nvram_mutex call sites, completing the mutex removal >>> >>> v3: >>> - Removed global nvram_mutex definition >>> >>> drivers/char/nvram.c | 16 +++------------- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/char/nvram.c b/drivers/char/nvram.c >>> index 9eff426a9286..e89cc1f1c89e 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/char/nvram.c >>> +++ b/drivers/char/nvram.c >>> @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ >>> #include <asm/nvram.h> >>> #endif >>> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvram_mutex); >>> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nvram_state_lock); >>> static int nvram_open_cnt; /* #times opened */ >>> static int nvram_open_mode; /* special open modes */ >>> @@ -310,11 +309,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, >>> break; >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32 >>> case IOC_NVRAM_SYNC: >>> - if (ppc_md.nvram_sync != NULL) { >>> - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); >>> + if (ppc_md.nvram_sync) >>> ppc_md.nvram_sync(); >>> - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); >>> - } >>> ret = 0; >>> break; >>> #endif >>> @@ -324,11 +320,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, >>> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) >>> return -EACCES; >>> - if (arch_nvram_ops.initialize != NULL) { >>> - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); >>> + if (arch_nvram_ops.initialize) >>> ret = arch_nvram_ops.initialize(); >>> - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); >>> - } >>> break; >>> case NVRAM_SETCKS: >>> /* just set checksum, contents unchanged (maybe useful after >>> @@ -336,11 +329,8 @@ static long nvram_misc_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, >>> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) >>> return -EACCES; >>> - if (arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum != NULL) { >>> - mutex_lock(&nvram_mutex); >>> + if (arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum) >>> ret = arch_nvram_ops.set_checksum(); >>> - mutex_unlock(&nvram_mutex); >>> - } >>> break; >>> #endif /* CONFIG_X86 || CONFIG_M68K */ >>> } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-07 9:02 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-03-30 10:35 [PATCH v4] char/nvram: Remove redundant nvram_mutex Venkat Rao Bagalkote 2026-03-31 1:49 ` Ritesh Harjani 2026-04-02 16:03 ` Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna 2026-04-07 6:41 ` Tellakula Yeswanth Krishna 2026-04-07 9:02 ` Venkat
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox