From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DF9C433E0 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 13:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8F064DE8 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 13:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235787AbhCANev (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 08:34:51 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39218 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235825AbhCANdu (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 08:33:50 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7EEAB8C; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 13:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:33:09 +0100 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Anton Yakovlev Cc: , , , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] ALSA: virtio: PCM substream operators In-Reply-To: References: <20210227085956.1700687-1-anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com> <20210227085956.1700687-7-anton.yakovlev@opensynergy.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 01 Mar 2021 10:29:24 +0100, Anton Yakovlev wrote: > > On 28.02.2021 12:32, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:59:53 +0100, > > Anton Yakovlev wrote: > >> > > > [snip] > > > >> +static snd_pcm_uframes_t > >> +virtsnd_pcm_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream) > >> +{ > >> + struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss = snd_pcm_substream_chip(substream); > >> + snd_pcm_uframes_t hw_ptr = SNDRV_PCM_POS_XRUN; > >> + unsigned long flags; > >> + > >> + spin_lock_irqsave(&vss->lock, flags); > >> + if (!vss->xfer_xrun) > >> + hw_ptr = bytes_to_frames(substream->runtime, vss->hw_ptr); > >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vss->lock, flags); > > > > Oh, and if we drop nonatomc PCM, both trigger and pointer callbacks > > are guaranteed to be called inside the spinlock, hence you can remove > > *_irqsave() but just us spin_lock() in those two callbacks. > > As I understand, spin_lock_irqsave() disables only local interrupts. But > what about other CPU cores? Those are already under spin_lock_irqsave() of the PCM substream lock (in the case of normal PCM operation without nonatomic flag). Takashi