public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Cc: Raghu Bankapur <quic_rbankapu@quicinc.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	ierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Zubin Mithra <zsm@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Krishna Jha <quic_kkishorj@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V0 1/1] ALSA: pcm: fix blocking while loop in snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0()
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:23:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hee3rur42.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83e4b67d-91d3-dca9-4b1f-d209f927d517@perex.cz>

On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 11:52:05 +0100,
Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> 
> On 25. 02. 22 11:39, Raghu Bankapur wrote:
> > When period interrupts are disabled, while loop in snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0()
> > results in the machine locking up if runtime->hw_ptr_buffer_jiffies is 0.
> > Validate runtime->hw_ptr_buffer_jiffies value before while loop to avoid
> > delta check.
> 
> I would set hw_ptr_buffer_jiffies to 1 in this case in snd_pcm_post_start().

I thought of it at the first glance, but after reading the code again,
I doubt whether it makes sense at all to allow this condition.
Since the buffer size is too small and the rate is too high, we can't
calculate the buffer crossing condition accurately under such
condition.

But, having either this zero check or minimal hw_ptr_buffer_jiffies=1
would be good in anyway, even if we add more check for the hw_params
for no-period-wakeup case.


thanks,

Takashi

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-25 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-25 10:39 [PATCH V0 0/1] ALSA: pcm: fix blocking while loop in Raghu Bankapur
2022-02-25 10:39 ` [PATCH V0 1/1] ALSA: pcm: fix blocking while loop in snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0() Raghu Bankapur
2022-02-25 10:52   ` Jaroslav Kysela
2022-02-25 11:23     ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
     [not found]       ` <35bfd332-891f-1323-8b61-9e4e2fc5cd1c@quicinc.com>
2022-02-28 15:58         ` Takashi Iwai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=s5hee3rur42.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=quic_kkishorj@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_rbankapu@quicinc.com \
    --cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=zsm@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox