From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Charbonnel <thomas@undata.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix shared interrupt handling of SA_INTERRUPT and SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:10:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5heklxhjbg.wl@alsa2.suse.de> (raw)
Hi,
while the recent investation of latency issues, Thomas Charbonne
suggested that there is a long-standing bug in the irq handler.
When the irq is shared, SA_INTERRUPT flag is checked only for the
first registered handler. When it's without SA_INTERRUPT, always
local_irq_enable() is called even if the second or later handler has
SA_INTERRUPT.
Also, handle_IRQ_event() always calls add_interrupt_randomness()
even if the irq is not for the handler with SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM.
This is a performance loss.
The patch below fixes these problems by adding the SA_INTERRUPT
handler always to the head of the irq list, and by checking the return
value of each handler.
The patch is for i386 and x86-64 only. Similar patches will be needed
for other architectures, too (or more better, making an
arch-independent generic handler as in voluntary-preemptive patch).
--
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> ALSA Developer - www.alsa-project.org
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c 2004-08-18 15:15:18.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/irq.c 2004-08-20 14:54:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -221,13 +221,21 @@ asmlinkage int handle_IRQ_event(unsigned
{
int status = 1; /* Force the "do bottom halves" bit */
int retval = 0;
-
- if (!(action->flags & SA_INTERRUPT))
- local_irq_enable();
+ int irq_off = 1;
do {
- status |= action->flags;
- retval |= action->handler(irq, action->dev_id, regs);
+ int ret;
+ /* Assume that all SA_INTERRUPT handlers are at the head
+ * of the irq queue
+ */
+ if (irq_off && ! (action->flags & SA_INTERRUPT)) {
+ local_irq_enable();
+ irq_off = 0;
+ }
+ ret = action->handler(irq, action->dev_id, regs);
+ if (ret)
+ status |= action->flags;
+ retval |= ret;
action = action->next;
} while (action);
if (status & SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM)
@@ -955,11 +963,16 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct i
return -EBUSY;
}
- /* add new interrupt at end of irq queue */
- do {
- p = &old->next;
- old = *p;
- } while (old);
+ if (new->flags & SA_INTERRUPT)
+ /* add interrupt at the start of the queue */
+ new->next = old;
+ else
+ /* add new interrupt at end of irq queue */
+ do {
+ p = &old->next;
+ old = *p;
+ } while (old);
+
shared = 1;
}
--- linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c 2004-08-20 15:04:26.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c 2004-08-20 15:07:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -213,13 +213,20 @@ inline void synchronize_irq(unsigned int
int handle_IRQ_event(unsigned int irq, struct pt_regs * regs, struct irqaction * action)
{
int status = 1; /* Force the "do bottom halves" bit */
-
- if (!(action->flags & SA_INTERRUPT))
- local_irq_enable();
+ int irq_off = 1;
do {
- status |= action->flags;
- action->handler(irq, action->dev_id, regs);
+ int ret;
+ /* Assume that all SA_INTERRUPT handlers are at the head
+ * of the irq queue
+ */
+ if (irq_off && ! (action->flags & SA_INTERRUPT)) {
+ local_irq_enable();
+ irq_off = 0;
+ }
+ ret = action->handler(irq, action->dev_id, regs);
+ if (ret)
+ status |= action->flags;
action = action->next;
} while (action);
if (status & SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM)
@@ -794,11 +801,16 @@ int setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct i
return -EBUSY;
}
- /* add new interrupt at end of irq queue */
- do {
- p = &old->next;
- old = *p;
- } while (old);
+ if (new->flags & SA_INTERRUPT)
+ /* add interrupt at the start of the queue */
+ new->next = old;
+ else
+ /* add new interrupt at end of irq queue */
+ do {
+ p = &old->next;
+ old = *p;
+ } while (old);
+
shared = 1;
}
next reply other threads:[~2004-08-23 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-23 17:10 Takashi Iwai [this message]
2004-08-23 17:29 ` [PATCH] Fix shared interrupt handling of SA_INTERRUPT and SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM Takashi Iwai
2004-08-23 18:09 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-08-25 3:45 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-25 11:17 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-08-25 20:41 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-26 12:50 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-08-26 14:04 ` Russell King
2004-08-26 14:10 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-08-26 14:18 ` Russell King
2004-08-26 14:27 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5heklxhjbg.wl@alsa2.suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas@undata.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox