From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Michael Karcher <kernel@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sound/pci/hda: Fix Amp-In count for widgets with implied selector
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:28:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hiphefe2b.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1333632596.4159.11.camel@localhost>
At Thu, 05 Apr 2012 15:29:56 +0200,
Michael Karcher wrote:
>
> A selector widget with AC_WCAP_IN_AMP has multiple input amplifiers (if
> the selector widget would have only one common amp, it would be labeled
> as "output amplifier" instead). This is just like mixer widgets.
>
> If a non-mixer/selector widget has an input amplifier, it is only one
> input amplifier, even if it has a connection list with more than one
> entry. The implied selector is placed before the single input amplifier.
>
> At least that is how I read the HDA specs, and what Conexant implements in
> their CX20549 codec.
It's rather cx20549-specific behavior. If you take a look at the BIOS
auto-parser, spec->single_adc_amp is set as a workaround.
Yes, the proc file output should be fixed as well, but you can't
change it globally for all codecs.
Takashi
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_proc.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_proc.c
> index 254ab52..9b942f0 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_proc.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_proc.c
> @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ static void print_codec_info(struct snd_info_entry *entry,
> snd_iprintf(buffer, " Amp-In vals: ");
> print_amp_vals(buffer, codec, nid, HDA_INPUT,
> wid_caps & AC_WCAP_STEREO,
> - wid_type == AC_WID_PIN ? 1 : conn_len);
> + (wid_type == AC_WID_AUD_SEL || wid_type == AC_WID_AUD_MIX) ? conn_len : 1);
> }
> if (wid_caps & AC_WCAP_OUT_AMP) {
> snd_iprintf(buffer, " Amp-Out caps: ");
> --
> 1.7.9.1
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-05 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-05 13:29 [PATCH 1/6] sound/pci/hda: Fix Amp-In count for widgets with implied selector Michael Karcher
2012-04-05 14:28 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hiphefe2b.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=kernel@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox