From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Patch "ASoC: topology: disable size checks for bytes_ext controls if needed" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:22:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hk0vd3tc3.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1aae5d8-3820-9126-d1a9-225f093dfde7@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:01:09 +0100,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/26/20 7:11 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:53:46AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> >>
> >> ASoC: topology: disable size checks for bytes_ext controls if needed
> >>
> >> to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
> >> http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> >>
> >> The filename of the patch is:
> >> asoc-topology-disable-size-checks-for-bytes_ext-cont.patch
> >> and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
> >>
> >> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> >> please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
> >>
> >
> > This breaks the build, so I'm dropping it from everywhere it had
> > problems.
> >
> > Also, why 5.4.y and not 4.19.y, but 4.14.y and 4.9.y?
>
> Ah yes, there's a missed dependency on
> fbd3eb7f66c5b ('ALSA: control: Add verification for kctl accesses')
>
> I thought all of this was 20 years old but that commit added the
> option SND_CTL_VALIDATION which exposed the problem with this topology
> patch. Given the date (January 2020), I don't think it makes sense
> before 5.6?
>
> I don't think this could have compiled prior to 5.6, I e.g. checked on
> 4.14.202 and the define SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_SKIP_CHECK was not
> defined either.
>
> git grep SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_SKIP_CHECK
> sound/soc/soc-topology.c: k->access |=
> SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_SKIP_CHECK;
>
> Summary: I suggested this patch be dropped for all versions that don't
> contain fbd3eb7f66c5b. Takashi, do you concur?
Yes, correct.
thanks,
Takashi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20201026055347.0F79E20882@mail.kernel.org>
2020-10-26 12:11 ` Patch "ASoC: topology: disable size checks for bytes_ext controls if needed" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree Greg KH
2020-10-26 15:01 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-10-26 15:22 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hk0vd3tc3.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox