public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Patch "ASoC: topology: disable size checks for bytes_ext controls if needed" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:22:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hk0vd3tc3.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1aae5d8-3820-9126-d1a9-225f093dfde7@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:01:09 +0100,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/26/20 7:11 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:53:46AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >> This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> >>
> >>      ASoC: topology: disable size checks for bytes_ext controls if needed
> >>
> >> to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
> >>      http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> >>
> >> The filename of the patch is:
> >>       asoc-topology-disable-size-checks-for-bytes_ext-cont.patch
> >> and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
> >>
> >> If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> >> please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
> >>
> >
> > This breaks the build, so I'm dropping it from everywhere it had
> > problems.
> >
> > Also, why 5.4.y and not 4.19.y, but 4.14.y and 4.9.y?
> 
> Ah yes, there's a missed dependency on
> fbd3eb7f66c5b ('ALSA: control: Add verification for kctl accesses')
> 
> I thought all of this was 20 years old but that commit added the
> option SND_CTL_VALIDATION which exposed the problem with this topology
> patch. Given the date (January 2020), I don't think it makes sense
> before 5.6?
> 
> I don't think this could have compiled prior to 5.6, I e.g. checked on
> 4.14.202 and the define SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_SKIP_CHECK was not
> defined either.
> 
> git grep SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_SKIP_CHECK
> sound/soc/soc-topology.c:                       k->access |=
> SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_SKIP_CHECK;
> 
> Summary: I suggested this patch be dropped for all versions that don't
> contain fbd3eb7f66c5b. Takashi, do you concur?

Yes, correct.


thanks,

Takashi

      reply	other threads:[~2020-10-26 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20201026055347.0F79E20882@mail.kernel.org>
2020-10-26 12:11 ` Patch "ASoC: topology: disable size checks for bytes_ext controls if needed" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree Greg KH
2020-10-26 15:01   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-10-26 15:22     ` Takashi Iwai [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=s5hk0vd3tc3.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox