From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751921AbaLZLOf (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Dec 2014 06:14:35 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38331 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751496AbaLZLOe (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Dec 2014 06:14:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 12:14:31 +0100 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: Jaroslav Kysela , Alexander Stein , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Ferre , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: atmel: fix building the ac97 driver for at91-multiplatform In-Reply-To: <20141225104837.GH4194@piout.net> References: <1419160689-20447-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20141225104837.GH4194@piout.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/24.4 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:48:37 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > Hi, > > On 25/12/2014 at 11:19:04 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote : > > At Sun, 21 Dec 2014 12:18:09 +0100, > > Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann > > > > > > at91 will no longer export the mach/cpu.h and mach/hardware.h header files > > > in the future, which would break building the atmel ac97c driver. > > > > > > Since the cpu_is_* check is only used to find out whether we are running > > > on avr32 or arm/at91, we can hardcode that check in the ARM case. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > Link: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg382068.html > > > > Is this targeted for 3.19 or 3.20? > > > > It is not urgent, that is definitely for 3.20. OK. But I can't apply it now because your sign-off is missing. If you submit a patch, you must give your own sign-off, too, even if it's not written by you. thanks, Takashi