Re: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch

Ingo Molnar
2004-07-11T09:54:27Z

* Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> >
> > For all the
> > other 200 might_sleep() points it doesnt matter much.
>
> Sorry, but an additional 100 might_sleep()s is surely excessive for
> debugging purposes, and unneeded for latency purposes: all these sites
> are preemptible anyway.

nono, i mean the existing ones. (it's 116 not 200) There's no plan to
add another 100, you've seen all the ones we found to be necessary for
this.

Ingo