From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751528AbaLaRr0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Dec 2014 12:47:26 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33322 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750956AbaLaRrZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Dec 2014 12:47:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 18:47:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Rickard Strandqvist Cc: eliot@blennerhassett.gen.nz, Jaroslav Kysela , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sound: pci: asihpi: hpifunc.c: Remove some unused functions In-Reply-To: References: <1420039022-10018-1-git-send-email-rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/24.4 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 18:07:36 +0100, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > > 2014-12-31 17:45 GMT+01:00 Takashi Iwai : > > > At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:41:33 +0100, > > Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > > > > > > 2014-12-31 17:07 GMT+01:00 Takashi Iwai : > > > > > > > At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:17:02 +0100, > > > > Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Removes some functions that are not used anywhere: > > > > > > > > See Eliot's previous reply. There will be some code changes, so this > > > > action is no-go as of now. > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > Takashi > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Takashi > > > > > > I have restored the function hpi_adapter_set_property() that Eliot > > wanted. > > > And I also have diff the files against the linux-next, but that there are > > > some notable differences. > > > > > > What is it you do not like about my current patch? > > > > More code changes may land in near future, so removing functions isn't > > good at all at this moment. We need to wait until the all things are > > settled down. IOW, forget about this for a while :) > > > > And please add Eliot to Cc at the next time. > > > > > > thanks, > > > > Takashi > > > > > + Eliot > > Hi > > Strange, because I ask specifically if it was just one function Eliot objected > to, and I therefore could resend the patch. In general, it's bad to do a task like this kind of cleanups during the code change is planned in future. There is more risk than gain in such a case. You can do it for the really stalling development codes, of course. Takashi