From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Egbert Eich <eich@suse.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Luc Verhaegen <lverhaegen@suse.de>
Subject: Re: vm86 segfaults with NX bit
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:20:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hwsewawon.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18726.62188.197402.569729@hermes.suse.de>
At Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:42:04 +0100,
Egbert Eich wrote:
>
> Takashi Iwai writes:
> > At Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:58:44 -0800,
> > Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:39:06 +0100
> > > Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > X guys reported that VESA driver segfaults in vm86 mode with a kernel
> > > > with CONFIG_X86_PAE, and it turned to be the NX bit. See Novell
> > > > bugzilla #443440:
> > > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443440
> > > >
> > > > I can confirm that the latest 2.6.28-rc still causes the same problem,
> > > > and it disappears when booted with noexec=off option.
> > > >
> > > > Also, when NX bit is reset for the first 1MB (or smaller) in
> > > > do_sys_vm86(), it also works as expected. But I have little clue
> > > > where to restore the bit again.
> > > >
> > > > Any good suggestions / solutions?
> > > >
> > >
> > > did the code that mapped this memory setup use PROT_EXEC ?
> >
> > A good question...
> > Luc, Egbert, how does VESA driver handle it?
>
>
> Yes, we set the PROT_EXEC for the VBIOS. But the segfault doesn't happen
> in VBIOS as far as I can tell. It happens on the 'exit instruction', a
> hlt (0xf6) which is trapped by vm86 so it returns to the caller.
> This is done by putting 0xf6 into address 0x600 and putting this address
> on the stack.
> The memory that's mapped at 0x600 in the Xserver's address space is
> allocated thru shmget() and attached to the right place in the processes
> memory space for vm86.
> We should call mprotect() on these ranges to set this memory executable.
> Hey, this code was orginally written almost 10 years ago!
>
> The patch below fixes the issue.
Good to know that a die-hard bug is fixed now.
Thanks!
Takashi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-22 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-20 15:39 vm86 segfaults with NX bit Takashi Iwai
2008-11-20 15:58 ` Alan Cox
2008-11-20 16:00 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-20 16:05 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-20 16:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-20 17:01 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-20 17:05 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-20 21:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-21 11:38 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-21 17:42 ` Egbert Eich
2008-11-22 10:20 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hwsewawon.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=eich@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lverhaegen@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox