Re: [Bug #12613] [Suspend regression][DRM, RADEON]

Dave Airlie
2009-02-09T02:26:30Z

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:07 AM, etienne <etienne.basset@numericable.fr> wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12613
>> Subject : [Suspend regression][DRM, RADEON]
>> Submitter : etienne <etienne.basset@numericable.fr>
>> Date : 2009-01-28 22:00 (12 days old)
>> First-Bad-Commit:
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a9d51a5ad1154b5b20add1e8d30a5564f8aabbe9
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123318030419558&w=4
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123334865404574&w=4
>>
>>
>>
>
> hello,
> yes it's still present in -rc4
> But I noticed that when I switch off KDE4.2 desktop effects, suspend to ram
> is 100% reliable with 2.6.29-rc4
> With 2.6.28, STR is 100% reliable with or without desktop effects
>

Hi Etienne,

Can you try commenting out the calls to the radeon_suspend and
radeon_resume hooks in radeon_drv.c?

Dave.

> hope this helps,
> Etienne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>