* [PATCH v3] char: nvram: Remove unused nvram_mutex to fix -Wunused-variable warning
@ 2026-03-30 6:22 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-03-30 6:42 ` Ritesh Harjani
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Venkat Rao Bagalkote @ 2026-03-30 6:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: linux-kbuild, linuxppc-dev, maddy, ritesh.list, arnd, chleroy,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote
drivers/char/nvram.c defines a static mutex 'nvram_mutex' which is never
used. This results in a compiler warning on linux-next builds:
warning: 'nvram_mutex' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
Remove the unused definition to avoid the warning.
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
---
v3:
- Removed global nvram_mutex entirely
drivers/char/nvram.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/nvram.c b/drivers/char/nvram.c
index 9eff426a9286..9ab2744cd375 100644
--- a/drivers/char/nvram.c
+++ b/drivers/char/nvram.c
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@
#include <asm/nvram.h>
#endif
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvram_mutex);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nvram_state_lock);
static int nvram_open_cnt; /* #times opened */
static int nvram_open_mode; /* special open modes */
--
2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] char: nvram: Remove unused nvram_mutex to fix -Wunused-variable warning
2026-03-30 6:22 [PATCH v3] char: nvram: Remove unused nvram_mutex to fix -Wunused-variable warning Venkat Rao Bagalkote
@ 2026-03-30 6:42 ` Ritesh Harjani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ritesh Harjani @ 2026-03-30 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Venkat Rao Bagalkote, linux-kernel
Cc: linux-kbuild, linuxppc-dev, maddy, arnd, chleroy,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> drivers/char/nvram.c defines a static mutex 'nvram_mutex' which is never
> used. This results in a compiler warning on linux-next builds:
>
> warning: 'nvram_mutex' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
>
> Remove the unused definition to avoid the warning.
>
That is not the only reason for removing the nvram_mutex. I think we
discussed in detail, why we think this can be removed here [1].
We should add those details in commit msg too.
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - Removed global nvram_mutex entirely
We only removed the mutex definition and not the usage right. This does
not look correct. Maybe you can check sashiko review comments for
details -
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260330062201.2581-1-venkat88%40linux.ibm.com
-ritesh
>
> drivers/char/nvram.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/nvram.c b/drivers/char/nvram.c
> index 9eff426a9286..9ab2744cd375 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/nvram.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/nvram.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@
> #include <asm/nvram.h>
> #endif
>
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(nvram_mutex);
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nvram_state_lock);
> static int nvram_open_cnt; /* #times opened */
> static int nvram_open_mode; /* special open modes */
> --
> 2.45.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-30 6:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-30 6:22 [PATCH v3] char: nvram: Remove unused nvram_mutex to fix -Wunused-variable warning Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-03-30 6:42 ` Ritesh Harjani
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox