From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264678AbTD0Pn4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:43:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264682AbTD0Pn4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:43:56 -0400 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:24992 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264678AbTD0Pnz (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:43:55 -0400 To: Shantanu Goel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.21-rc1-ac2 NFS close-to-open question References: <20030427151201.27191.qmail@web12802.mail.yahoo.com> From: Trond Myklebust Date: 27 Apr 2003 17:56:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030427151201.27191.qmail@web12802.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> " " == Shantanu Goel writes: > if (!(NFS_SERVER(inode)->flags & NFS_MOUNT_NOCTO)) { > err = > _nfs_revalidate_inode(NFS_SERVER(inode),inode); > if (err) > goto out; > } > If we desire close-to-open consistency, and assuming my reading > of the code is correct, is this a typo? Duh... Now *that* is downright embarassing... Yup. Damn right... Cheers, Trond