* Has anyone run the Connectathon Testsuite recently?
@ 2001-10-22 6:24 H . J . Lu
2001-10-22 7:54 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-22 8:28 ` [NFS] " Trond Myklebust
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: H . J . Lu @ 2001-10-22 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nfs; +Cc: linux kernel, alan
I checked out kernel 2.4.9-6 from RedHat 7.1 updates. It failed the
Connectathon Testsuite against the Linux and none-Linux server. I
believe both NFS server and client are broken in 2.4.9-6. See
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54868
Now the question is how bad the current Linus/AC kernels are?
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Has anyone run the Connectathon Testsuite recently?
2001-10-22 6:24 Has anyone run the Connectathon Testsuite recently? H . J . Lu
@ 2001-10-22 7:54 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-22 8:28 ` [NFS] " Trond Myklebust
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2001-10-22 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H . J . Lu; +Cc: nfs, linux kernel, alan
> Connectathon Testsuite against the Linux and none-Linux server. I
> believe both NFS server and client are broken in 2.4.9-6. See
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54868
>
> Now the question is how bad the current Linus/AC kernels are?
Hopefully pretty close since there isn't much NFS related difference between
vanilla and -ac currently. The -ac client has the NFS inode structure in its
own slab being the major change
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [NFS] Has anyone run the Connectathon Testsuite recently?
2001-10-22 6:24 Has anyone run the Connectathon Testsuite recently? H . J . Lu
2001-10-22 7:54 ` Alan Cox
@ 2001-10-22 8:28 ` Trond Myklebust
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2001-10-22 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H . J . Lu; +Cc: nfs, linux kernel, alan
>>>>> " " == hjl <H> writes:
> I checked out kernel 2.4.9-6 from RedHat 7.1 updates. It failed
> the Connectathon Testsuite against the Linux and none-Linux
> server. I believe both NFS server and client are broken in
> 2.4.9-6. See
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54868
> Now the question is how bad the current Linus/AC kernels are?
They are not affected. The RedHat kernel seems to have the (known) bug
in which the grace period isn't reset. My fault for introducing it in
the 2.4.9-ac series...
I haven't gotten round to syncing up the AC kernel to the full reclaim
code that's in Linus' kernel, but Alan has already applied the
following patch (as of 2.4.10-ac12).
Cheers,
Trond
--- linux-2.4.9-6/fs/lockd/svc.c.orig Thu Oct 18 15:00:46 2001
+++ linux-2.4.9-6/fs/lockd/svc.c Mon Oct 22 10:25:21 2001
@@ -122,6 +122,15 @@
if (nlmsvc_ops) {
nlmsvc_ops->detach();
grace_period_expire = nlmsvc_grace_period + jiffies;
+#ifdef RPC_DEBUG
+ nlmsvc_grace_period = 10 * HZ;
+#else
+ if (nlm_grace_period)
+ nlmsvc_grace_period = ((nlm_grace_period + nlm_timeout - 1)
+ / nlm_timeout) * nlm_timeout * HZ;
+ else
+ nlmsvc_grace_period = 5 * nlm_timeout * HZ;
+#endif
}
}
@@ -133,8 +142,10 @@
*/
if (!grace_period_expire) {
timeout = nlmsvc_retry_blocked();
- } else if (time_before(grace_period_expire, jiffies))
+ } else if (time_before(grace_period_expire, jiffies)) {
grace_period_expire = 0;
+ nlmsvc_grace_period = 0;
+ }
/*
* Find a socket with data available and call its
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-22 8:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-22 6:24 Has anyone run the Connectathon Testsuite recently? H . J . Lu
2001-10-22 7:54 ` Alan Cox
2001-10-22 8:28 ` [NFS] " Trond Myklebust
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox