From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:15:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:14:55 -0400 Received: from gnu.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.4]:37892 "EHLO gnu.in-berlin.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:14:46 -0400 X-Envelope-From: news@bytesex.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: not-for-mail From: Gerd Knorr Newsgroups: lists.linux.kernel Subject: Re: H.323 and 2.4 Date: 4 Sep 2001 19:29:31 GMT Organization: SuSE Labs, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Au=DFenstelle?= Berlin Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <999616751.3b94f0ef41ca8@webmail.fesppr.br> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost X-Trace: bytesex.org 999631771 8560 127.0.0.1 (4 Sep 2001 19:29:31 GMT) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.1 (Linux) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexandre Hautequest wrote: > Hi all. > > The H.323 protocol, as many of you know, got some issues when used in a masq'ed > env. The guys at http://www.coritel.it/coritel/ip/sofia/nat/nat2/nat2.htm have a > 2.2 module to solve this masq trouble. > > Anyone have any solution for 2.4? Checkk netfilter maillist archive + cvs. There was some discussion about that recently. Gerd -- Damn lot people confuse usability and eye-candy.