From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 04:50:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 04:49:59 -0400 Received: from gnu.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.4]:38162 "EHLO gnu.in-berlin.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 04:49:44 -0400 X-Envelope-From: news@bytesex.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Path: not-for-mail From: Gerd Knorr Newsgroups: lists.linux.kernel Subject: Re: PNPBIOS: warning: >= 16 resources, overflow? Date: 6 Sep 2001 08:42:40 GMT Organization: SuSE Labs, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Au=DFenstelle?= Berlin Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <999763976.1544.16.camel@LNX.iNES.RO> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost X-Trace: bytesex.org 999765760 3551 127.0.0.1 (6 Sep 2001 08:42:40 GMT) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.1 (Linux) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote: > > While browsing trough my boot messages I noticed this warning. > > PNPBIOS: warning: >= 16 resources, overflow? > > This appeared somewhere in 2.4.9-ac series. > Is it something I should be worried about ? > See below bootlog.txt, .config and lspci lspnp (comes with pcmcia-cs) would be more intresting. The pnpbios code fills a "struct pci_dev" for each device reported by the pnpbios, and it looks like your portable has one device with alot ressources, so the ressources array in struct pci_dev can't hold them all. There is a #define in include/linux/pci.h for the array size ... Gerd -- Damn lot people confuse usability and eye-candy.