From: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>,
dsd@gentoo.org, kernel@gentoo.org, draconx@gmail.com,
jpdenheijer@gmail.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:06:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <slrnekc8np.2vm.olecom@flower.upol.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200610301522.k9UFMXmM004701@turing-police.cc.vt.edu
On 2006-10-30, Valdis.Kletnieks wrote:
>
> Hmm.. and even the 'ln' worked even when z9 was chmod 0. ;)
(WTF! I'm no wonder any more, why all that selinux was brought ;)
Well, i've said already about roots in post above.
This fix is for needless mktemp and old binutils.
Fix for roots:
,--
|if [ `id -u` == "0" ]; then echo "Root landed !!!"; ! true; fi
`--
More polite fools-protection, with guaranteed permission from the user:
,--
|if [ `id -u` == "0" ]; then useradd bkernel && su bkernel fi;
`--
____
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-30 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-28 23:07 [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch Horst Schirmeier
2006-10-29 2:07 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-29 12:08 ` Horst Schirmeier
2006-10-29 16:16 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-29 17:52 ` Oleg Verych
2006-10-29 22:52 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-10-30 8:16 ` Jan Beulich
2006-10-30 13:16 ` Oleg Verych
[not found] ` <45460E6C.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
2006-10-30 14:42 ` Oleg Verych
2006-10-30 15:22 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-30 16:06 ` Oleg Verych [this message]
2006-10-30 22:12 ` Oleg Verych
2006-10-31 0:12 ` Horst Schirmeier
2006-10-31 0:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-10-31 1:14 ` Horst Schirmeier
2006-10-31 13:51 ` Oleg Verych
2006-11-02 12:46 ` Jan Peter den Heijer
2006-11-17 5:17 ` kbuild: O= with M= (Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch) Oleg Verych
2007-01-23 7:36 ` [fix, rfc] " Oleg Verych
2007-01-24 8:54 ` [patch] kbuild: improving option checking " Oleg Verych
2007-01-24 16:06 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-24 19:28 ` [patch] spell 4 kbuild: improving option checking Oleg Verych
2006-10-31 0:27 ` [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch Horst Schirmeier
2006-10-31 13:32 ` Oleg Verych
2006-11-15 14:17 ` kbuild-mm: $(objtree)/knull vs mktemp (was Re: [PATCH -mm] replacement for broken kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch) Oleg Verych
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=slrnekc8np.2vm.olecom@flower.upol.cz \
--to=olecom@flower.upol.cz \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=draconx@gmail.com \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=jpdenheijer@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox