From: tip-bot for Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, peterz@infradead.org, maxk@qualcomm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, ghaskins@novell.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Fully integrate cpus_active_map and root-domain code
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:13:25 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-00aec93d10a051ea64f83eff75d4065a19508ea6@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090730145723.25226.24493.stgit@dev.haskins.net>
Commit-ID: 00aec93d10a051ea64f83eff75d4065a19508ea6
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/00aec93d10a051ea64f83eff75d4065a19508ea6
Author: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:57:23 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:26:12 +0200
sched: Fully integrate cpus_active_map and root-domain code
Reflect "active" cpus in the rq->rd->online field, instead of
the online_map.
The motivation is that things that use the root-domain code
(such as cpupri) only care about cpus classified as "active"
anyway. By synchronizing the root-domain state with the active
map, we allow several optimizations.
For instance, we can remove an extra cpumask_and from the
scheduler hotpath by utilizing rq->rd->online (since it is now
a cached version of cpu_active_map & rq->rd->span).
Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20090730145723.25226.24493.stgit@dev.haskins.net>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched_fair.c | 10 +++++++---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 7 -------
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 613fee5..475138c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -7927,7 +7927,7 @@ static void rq_attach_root(struct rq *rq, struct root_domain *rd)
rq->rd = rd;
cpumask_set_cpu(rq->cpu, rd->span);
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(rq->cpu, cpu_online_mask))
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(rq->cpu, cpu_active_mask))
set_rq_online(rq);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 652e8bd..4934729 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1046,17 +1046,21 @@ static void yield_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
* search starts with cpus closest then further out as needed,
* so we always favor a closer, idle cpu.
* Domains may include CPUs that are not usable for migration,
- * hence we need to mask them out (cpu_active_mask)
+ * hence we need to mask them out (rq->rd->online)
*
* Returns the CPU we should wake onto.
*/
#if defined(ARCH_HAS_SCHED_WAKE_IDLE)
+
+#define cpu_rd_active(cpu, rq) cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->online)
+
static int wake_idle(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
{
struct sched_domain *sd;
int i;
unsigned int chosen_wakeup_cpu;
int this_cpu;
+ struct rq *task_rq = task_rq(p);
/*
* At POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP level, if both this_cpu and prev_cpu
@@ -1089,10 +1093,10 @@ static int wake_idle(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
if ((sd->flags & SD_WAKE_IDLE)
|| ((sd->flags & SD_WAKE_IDLE_FAR)
- && !task_hot(p, task_rq(p)->clock, sd))) {
+ && !task_hot(p, task_rq->clock, sd))) {
for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd),
&p->cpus_allowed) {
- if (cpu_active(i) && idle_cpu(i)) {
+ if (cpu_rd_active(i, task_rq) && idle_cpu(i)) {
if (i != task_cpu(p)) {
schedstat_inc(p,
se.nr_wakeups_idle);
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index a8f89bc..13f728e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -1173,13 +1173,6 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
return -1; /* No targets found */
/*
- * Only consider CPUs that are usable for migration.
- * I guess we might want to change cpupri_find() to ignore those
- * in the first place.
- */
- cpumask_and(lowest_mask, lowest_mask, cpu_active_mask);
-
- /*
* At this point we have built a mask of cpus representing the
* lowest priority tasks in the system. Now we want to elect
* the best one based on our affinity and topology.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-02 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-30 14:57 [PATCH 0/2] scheduler fixes Gregory Haskins
2009-07-30 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] [RESEND] sched: Fully integrate cpus_active_map and root-domain code Gregory Haskins
2009-07-30 15:01 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-07-30 15:10 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-08-02 13:13 ` tip-bot for Gregory Haskins [this message]
2009-07-30 14:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: fix race in cpupri introduced by cpumask_var changes Gregory Haskins
2009-08-02 13:12 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix " tip-bot for Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-00aec93d10a051ea64f83eff75d4065a19508ea6@git.kernel.org \
--to=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox