public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Dave Hansen <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dave@sr71.net, peterz@infradead.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	deller@gmx.de, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: [tip:mm/pkeys] mm/pkeys: Fix siginfo ABI breakage caused by new u64 field
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:53:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-16bc7477807393efb5b81f875888ee9221ead3a1@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160301125451.02C7426D@viggo.jf.intel.com>

Commit-ID:  16bc7477807393efb5b81f875888ee9221ead3a1
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/16bc7477807393efb5b81f875888ee9221ead3a1
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 04:54:51 -0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 16:44:21 +0100

mm/pkeys: Fix siginfo ABI breakage caused by new u64 field

Stephen Rothwell reported this linux-next build failure:

	http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160226164406.065a1ffc@canb.auug.org.au

... caused by the Memory Protection Keys patches from the tip tree triggering
a newly introduced build-time sanity check on an ARM build, because they changed
the ABI of siginfo in an unexpected way.

If u64 has a natural alignment of 8 bytes (this is rare, most 32-bit
platforms align it to 4 bytes), then the leadup to the _sifields union
matters:

typedef struct siginfo {
        int si_signo;
        int si_errno;
        int si_code;

        union {
	...
        } _sifields;
} __ARCH_SI_ATTRIBUTES siginfo_t;

Note how the first 3 fields give us 12 bytes, so _sifields is not 8
naturally bytes aligned.

Before the _pkey field addition the largest element of _sifields (on
32-bit platforms) was 32 bits. With the u64 added, the minimum alignment
requirement increased to 8 bytes on those (rare) 32-bit platforms. Thus
GCC padded the space after si_code with 4 extra bytes, and shifted all
_sifields offsets by 4 bytes - breaking the ABI of all of those
remaining fields.

On 64-bit platforms this problem was hidden due to _sifields already
having numerous fields with natural 8 bytes alignment (pointers).

To fix this, we replace the u64 with an '__u32'.  The __u32 does not
increase the minimum alignment requirement of the union, and it is
also large enough to store the 16-bit pkey we have today on x86.

Reported-by: Stehen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Stehen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: cd0ea35ff551 ("signals, pkeys: Notify userspace about protection key faults")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160301125451.02C7426D@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 2 +-
 arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h | 2 +-
 include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h   | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h b/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
index 0151cfa..f72bf01 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ typedef struct siginfo {
 					void __user *_upper;
 				} _addr_bnd;
 				/* used when si_code=SEGV_PKUERR */
-				u64 _pkey;
+				__u32 _pkey;
 			};
 		} _sigfault;
 
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h b/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
index 6f4edf0..cc49dc2 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/siginfo.h
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ typedef struct siginfo {
 					void __user *_upper;
 				} _addr_bnd;
 				/* used when si_code=SEGV_PKUERR */
-				u64 _pkey;
+				__u32 _pkey;
 			};
 		} _sigfault;
 
diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
index 90384d5..1abaf62 100644
--- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
+++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ typedef struct siginfo {
 					void __user *_upper;
 				} _addr_bnd;
 				/* used when si_code=SEGV_PKUERR */
-				u64 _pkey;
+				__u32 _pkey;
 			};
 		} _sigfault;
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-03 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-01 12:54 [PATCH] [v4] x86, pkeys: fix siginfo ABI breakage from new field Dave Hansen
2016-03-03 15:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-03 16:53 ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen [this message]
2016-03-03 17:28   ` [tip:mm/pkeys] mm/pkeys: Fix siginfo ABI breakage caused by new u64 field Linus Torvalds
2016-03-05 13:50     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-05 16:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-06 18:45         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-07  8:49           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-05 14:03 ` tip-bot for Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-16bc7477807393efb5b81f875888ee9221ead3a1@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox