[tip:x86/urgent] x86/boot/64/clang: Use fixup_pointer() to access 'next_early_pgt'

[tip-bot for Alexander Potapenko <tipbot@zytor.com>]

Commit-ID:  187e91fe5e915f4b7f39b824aa422493463e443d
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/187e91fe5e915f4b7f39b824aa422493463e443d
Author:     Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:08:08 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:53:00 +0200

x86/boot/64/clang: Use fixup_pointer() to access 'next_early_pgt'

__startup_64() is normally using fixup_pointer() to access globals in a
position-independent fashion. However 'next_early_pgt' was accessed
directly, which wasn't guaranteed to work.

Luckily GCC was generating a R_X86_64_PC32 PC-relative relocation for
'next_early_pgt', but Clang emitted a R_X86_64_32S, which led to
accessing invalid memory and rebooting the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Davidson <md@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: c88d71508e36 ("x86/boot/64: Rewrite startup_64() in C")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170816190808.131748-1-glider@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
index 46c3c73..9ba7954 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head64.c
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ void __head __startup_64(unsigned long physaddr)
 	pudval_t *pud;
 	pmdval_t *pmd, pmd_entry;
 	int i;
+	unsigned int *next_pgt_ptr;
 
 	/* Is the address too large? */
 	if (physaddr >> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS)
@@ -91,9 +92,9 @@ void __head __startup_64(unsigned long physaddr)
 	 * creates a bunch of nonsense entries but that is fine --
 	 * it avoids problems around wraparound.
 	 */
-
-	pud = fixup_pointer(early_dynamic_pgts[next_early_pgt++], physaddr);
-	pmd = fixup_pointer(early_dynamic_pgts[next_early_pgt++], physaddr);
+	next_pgt_ptr = fixup_pointer(&next_early_pgt, physaddr);
+	pud = fixup_pointer(early_dynamic_pgts[(*next_pgt_ptr)++], physaddr);
+	pmd = fixup_pointer(early_dynamic_pgts[(*next_pgt_ptr)++], physaddr);
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_5LEVEL)) {
 		p4d = fixup_pointer(early_dynamic_pgts[next_early_pgt++], physaddr);