public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Teach might_sleep() about preemptible RCU
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:52:18 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-234da7bcdc7aaa935846534c3b726dbc79a9cdd5@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260991265-8451-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>

Commit-ID:  234da7bcdc7aaa935846534c3b726dbc79a9cdd5
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/234da7bcdc7aaa935846534c3b726dbc79a9cdd5
Author:     Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:21:05 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:46:44 +0100

sched: Teach might_sleep() about preemptible RCU

In practice, it is harmless to voluntarily sleep in a
rcu_read_lock() section if we are running under preempt rcu, but
it is illegal if we build a kernel running non-preemptable rcu.

Currently, might_sleep() doesn't notice sleepable operations
under rcu_read_lock() sections if we are running under
preemptable rcu because preempt_count() is left untouched after
rcu_read_lock() in this case. But we want developers who test
their changes under such config to notice the "sleeping while
atomic" issues.

So we add rcu_read_lock_nesting to prempt_count() in
might_sleep() checks.

[ v2: Handle rcu-tiny ]
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LKML-Reference: <1260991265-8451-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 include/linux/rcutiny.h |    5 +++++
 include/linux/rcutree.h |   11 +++++++++++
 kernel/sched.c          |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index c4ba9a7..96cc307 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -101,4 +101,9 @@ static inline void exit_rcu(void)
 {
 }
 
+static inline int rcu_preempt_depth(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #endif /* __LINUX_RCUTINY_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index c93eee5..8044b1b 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -45,6 +45,12 @@ extern void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
 extern void synchronize_rcu(void);
 extern void exit_rcu(void);
 
+/*
+ * Defined as macro as it is a very low level header
+ * included from areas that don't even know about current
+ */
+#define rcu_preempt_depth() (current->rcu_read_lock_nesting)
+
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
 
 static inline void __rcu_read_lock(void)
@@ -63,6 +69,11 @@ static inline void exit_rcu(void)
 {
 }
 
+static inline int rcu_preempt_depth(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
 
 static inline void __rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index af7dfa7..7be88a7 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -9682,7 +9682,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP
 static inline int preempt_count_equals(int preempt_offset)
 {
-	int nested = preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE;
+	int nested = (preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) + rcu_preempt_depth();
 
 	return (nested == PREEMPT_INATOMIC_BASE + preempt_offset);
 }

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-17 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-14 22:44 [PATCH] sched: Teach might_sleep about preemptable rcu Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-14 23:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-16  8:18 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Teach might_sleep() about preemptible RCU tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-16 14:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-16 15:30     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-16 18:57       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-16 19:13         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-16 19:21     ` [PATCH] " Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-16 19:23       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-17  1:37         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-17  8:49           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-17 19:49             ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-12-17 10:52       ` tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-234da7bcdc7aaa935846534c3b726dbc79a9cdd5@git.kernel.org \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox