From: tip-bot for Rik van Riel <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: riel@redhat.com, jstancek@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched/numa: Fix math underflow in task_tick_numa()
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:40:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-25b3e5a3344e1f700c1efec5b6f0199f04707fb1@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446756983-28173-2-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com>
Commit-ID: 25b3e5a3344e1f700c1efec5b6f0199f04707fb1
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/25b3e5a3344e1f700c1efec5b6f0199f04707fb1
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 15:56:22 -0500
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:13:27 +0100
sched/numa: Fix math underflow in task_tick_numa()
The NUMA balancing code implements delays in scanning by
advancing curr->node_stamp beyond curr->se.sum_exec_runtime.
With unsigned math, that creates an underflow, which results
in task_numa_work being queued all the time, even when we
don't want to.
Avoiding the math underflow makes it possible to reduce CPU
overhead in the NUMA balancing code.
Reported-and-tested-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1446756983-28173-2-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 824aa9f..f04fda8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2302,7 +2302,7 @@ void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
now = curr->se.sum_exec_runtime;
period = (u64)curr->numa_scan_period * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
- if (now - curr->node_stamp > period) {
+ if (now > curr->node_stamp + period) {
if (!curr->node_stamp)
curr->numa_scan_period = task_scan_min(curr);
curr->node_stamp += period;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-10 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-05 20:56 [PATCH 0/2] sched,numa: cap pte scanning overhead to 3% of run time riel
2015-11-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched,numa: fix math underflow in task_tick_numa riel
2015-11-10 6:40 ` tip-bot for Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-11-05 20:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched,numa: cap pte scanning overhead to 3% of run time riel
2015-11-23 16:19 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Cap PTE " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-25b3e5a3344e1f700c1efec5b6f0199f04707fb1@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox