From: tip-bot for Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@google.com, hpa@zytor.com,
mingo@kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de,
asharma@fb.com
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Fix broken LBR fixup code
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:40:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-25f42985825dd93f0593efe454e54c2aa13f7830@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120611134426.GA7542@quad>
Commit-ID: 25f42985825dd93f0593efe454e54c2aa13f7830
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/25f42985825dd93f0593efe454e54c2aa13f7830
Author: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:44:26 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:00:28 +0200
perf/x86: Fix broken LBR fixup code
I noticed that the LBR fixups were not working anymore
on programs where they used to. I tracked this down to
a recent change to copy_from_user_nmi():
db0dc75d640 ("perf/x86: Check user address explicitly in copy_from_user_nmi()")
This commit added a call to __range_not_ok() to the
copy_from_user_nmi() routine. The problem is that the logic
of the test must be reversed. __range_not_ok() returns 0 if the
range is VALID. We want to return early from copy_from_user_nmi()
if the range is NOT valid.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Acked-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120611134426.GA7542@quad
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c
index 677b1ed..4f74d94 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ copy_from_user_nmi(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
void *map;
int ret;
- if (__range_not_ok(from, n, TASK_SIZE) == 0)
+ if (__range_not_ok(from, n, TASK_SIZE))
return len;
do {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-14 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 13:44 [PATCH] perf/x86: fix broken LBR fixup code Stephane Eranian
2012-06-11 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-11 19:41 ` Arun Sharma
2012-06-14 8:40 ` tip-bot for Stephane Eranian [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-25f42985825dd93f0593efe454e54c2aa13f7830@git.kernel.org \
--to=eranian@google.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox