public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, gorcunov@gmail.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, dzickus@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Convert per_cpu to __get_cpu_var for readability
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:06:43 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-26e09c6eee14f4827b55137ba0eedc4e77cd50ab@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274133966-18415-2-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>

Commit-ID:  26e09c6eee14f4827b55137ba0eedc4e77cd50ab
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/26e09c6eee14f4827b55137ba0eedc4e77cd50ab
Author:     Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 17 May 2010 18:06:04 -0400
Committer:  Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:32:14 +0200

lockup_detector: Convert per_cpu to __get_cpu_var for readability

Just a bunch of conversions as suggested by Frederic W.
__get_cpu_var() provides preemption disabled checks.

Plus it gives more readability as it makes it obvious
we are dealing locally now with these vars.

Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <1274133966-18415-2-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/watchdog.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index e53622c..91b0b26 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static unsigned long get_sample_period(void)
 /* Commands for resetting the watchdog */
 static void __touch_watchdog(void)
 {
-	int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
 	__get_cpu_var(watchdog_touch_ts) = get_timestamp(this_cpu);
 }
@@ -157,21 +157,21 @@ void touch_softlockup_watchdog_sync(void)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
 /* watchdog detector functions */
-static int is_hardlockup(int cpu)
+static int is_hardlockup(void)
 {
-	unsigned long hrint = per_cpu(hrtimer_interrupts, cpu);
+	unsigned long hrint = __get_cpu_var(hrtimer_interrupts);
 
-	if (per_cpu(hrtimer_interrupts_saved, cpu) == hrint)
+	if (__get_cpu_var(hrtimer_interrupts_saved) == hrint)
 		return 1;
 
-	per_cpu(hrtimer_interrupts_saved, cpu) = hrint;
+	__get_cpu_var(hrtimer_interrupts_saved) = hrint;
 	return 0;
 }
 #endif
 
-static int is_softlockup(unsigned long touch_ts, int cpu)
+static int is_softlockup(unsigned long touch_ts)
 {
-	unsigned long now = get_timestamp(cpu);
+	unsigned long now = get_timestamp(smp_processor_id());
 
 	/* Warn about unreasonable delays: */
 	if (time_after(now, touch_ts + softlockup_thresh))
@@ -206,8 +206,6 @@ void watchdog_overflow_callback(struct perf_event *event, int nmi,
 		 struct perf_sample_data *data,
 		 struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
-
 	if (__get_cpu_var(watchdog_nmi_touch) == true) {
 		__get_cpu_var(watchdog_nmi_touch) = false;
 		return;
@@ -219,7 +217,9 @@ void watchdog_overflow_callback(struct perf_event *event, int nmi,
 	 * fired multiple times before we overflow'd.  If it hasn't
 	 * then this is a good indication the cpu is stuck
 	 */
-	if (is_hardlockup(this_cpu)) {
+	if (is_hardlockup()) {
+		int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
 		/* only print hardlockups once */
 		if (__get_cpu_var(hard_watchdog_warn) == true)
 			return;
@@ -247,7 +247,6 @@ static inline void watchdog_interrupt_count(void) { return; }
 /* watchdog kicker functions */
 static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
 {
-	int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	unsigned long touch_ts = __get_cpu_var(watchdog_touch_ts);
 	struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
 	int duration;
@@ -262,12 +261,12 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
 	hrtimer_forward_now(hrtimer, ns_to_ktime(get_sample_period()));
 
 	if (touch_ts == 0) {
-		if (unlikely(per_cpu(softlockup_touch_sync, this_cpu))) {
+		if (unlikely(__get_cpu_var(softlockup_touch_sync))) {
 			/*
 			 * If the time stamp was touched atomically
 			 * make sure the scheduler tick is up to date.
 			 */
-			per_cpu(softlockup_touch_sync, this_cpu) = false;
+			__get_cpu_var(softlockup_touch_sync) = false;
 			sched_clock_tick();
 		}
 		__touch_watchdog();
@@ -280,14 +279,14 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
 	 * indicate it is getting cpu time.  If it hasn't then
 	 * this is a good indication some task is hogging the cpu
 	 */
-	duration = is_softlockup(touch_ts, this_cpu);
+	duration = is_softlockup(touch_ts);
 	if (unlikely(duration)) {
 		/* only warn once */
 		if (__get_cpu_var(soft_watchdog_warn) == true)
 			return HRTIMER_RESTART;
 
 		printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#%d stuck for %us! [%s:%d]\n",
-			this_cpu, duration,
+			smp_processor_id(), duration,
 			current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
 		print_modules();
 		print_irqtrace_events(current);
@@ -309,10 +308,10 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
 /*
  * The watchdog thread - touches the timestamp.
  */
-static int watchdog(void *__bind_cpu)
+static int watchdog(void *unused)
 {
 	struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO-1 };
-	struct hrtimer *hrtimer = &per_cpu(watchdog_hrtimer, (unsigned long)__bind_cpu);
+	struct hrtimer *hrtimer = &__raw_get_cpu_var(watchdog_hrtimer);
 
 	sched_setscheduler(current, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
 
@@ -328,7 +327,7 @@ static int watchdog(void *__bind_cpu)
 	/*
 	 * Run briefly once per second to reset the softlockup timestamp.
 	 * If this gets delayed for more than 60 seconds then the
-	 * debug-printout triggers in softlockup_tick().
+	 * debug-printout triggers in watchdog_timer_fn().
 	 */
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
 		__touch_watchdog();

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-19 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-17 22:06 [PATCH 0/3] lockup detector fixes Don Zickus
2010-05-17 22:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] lockup_detector: convert per_cpu to __get_cpu_var for readability Don Zickus
2010-05-19  8:47   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:06   ` tip-bot for Don Zickus [this message]
2010-05-17 22:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] [watchdog] separate hardlockup/softlockup enable paths Don Zickus
2010-05-19  8:46   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-17 22:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] [watchdog] re-introduce support for nmi_watchdog, nosoftlockup Don Zickus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-26e09c6eee14f4827b55137ba0eedc4e77cd50ab@git.kernel.org \
    --to=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox