From: tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, venki@google.com
Subject: [tip:x86/timers] x86, hpet: Restrict read back to affected ATI chipsets
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:36:56 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-30a564be9d9554c168a654eddc2165869cc0d7bf@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100225185348.GA9674@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Commit-ID: 30a564be9d9554c168a654eddc2165869cc0d7bf
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/30a564be9d9554c168a654eddc2165869cc0d7bf
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:31:36 +0200
Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:14:29 -0700
x86, hpet: Restrict read back to affected ATI chipsets
After programming the HPET, we do a readback as a workaround for
ATI/SBx00 chipsets as a synchronization. Unfortunately this triggers
an erratum in newer ICH chipsets (ICH9+) where reading the comparator
immediately after the write returns the old value. Furthermore, as
always, I/O reads are bad for performance.
Therefore, restrict the readback to the chipsets that need it, or, for
debugging purposes, when we are running with hpet=verbose.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100225185348.GA9674@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/hpet.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hpet.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hpet.h
index 1d5c08a..004e6e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hpet.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hpet.h
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ extern unsigned long force_hpet_address;
extern u8 hpet_blockid;
extern int hpet_force_user;
extern u8 hpet_msi_disable;
+extern u8 hpet_readback_cmp;
extern int is_hpet_enabled(void);
extern int hpet_enable(void);
extern void hpet_disable(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
index 23b4ecd..a198b7c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
unsigned long hpet_address;
u8 hpet_blockid; /* OS timer block num */
u8 hpet_msi_disable;
+u8 hpet_readback_cmp;
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
static unsigned long hpet_num_timers;
@@ -395,19 +396,23 @@ static int hpet_next_event(unsigned long delta,
* at that point and we would wait for the next hpet interrupt
* forever. We found out that reading the CMP register back
* forces the transfer so we can rely on the comparison with
- * the counter register below. If the read back from the
- * compare register does not match the value we programmed
- * then we might have a real hardware problem. We can not do
- * much about it here, but at least alert the user/admin with
- * a prominent warning.
- * An erratum on some chipsets (ICH9,..), results in comparator read
- * immediately following a write returning old value. Workaround
- * for this is to read this value second time, when first
- * read returns old value.
+ * the counter register below.
+ *
+ * That works fine on those ATI chipsets, but on newer Intel
+ * chipsets (ICH9...) this triggers due to an erratum: Reading
+ * the comparator immediately following a write is returning
+ * the old value.
+ *
+ * We restrict the read back to the affected ATI chipsets (set
+ * by quirks) and also run it with hpet=verbose for debugging
+ * purposes.
*/
- if (unlikely((u32)hpet_readl(HPET_Tn_CMP(timer)) != cnt)) {
- WARN_ONCE(hpet_readl(HPET_Tn_CMP(timer)) != cnt,
- KERN_WARNING "hpet: compare register read back failed.\n");
+ if (hpet_readback_cmp || hpet_verbose) {
+ u32 cmp = hpet_readl(HPET_Tn_CMP(timer));
+
+ if (cmp != cnt)
+ printk_once(KERN_WARNING
+ "hpet: compare register read back failed.\n");
}
return (s32)(hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER) - cnt) >= 0 ? -ETIME : 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
index 12e9fea..cd2c336 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/quirks.c
@@ -495,10 +495,15 @@ void force_hpet_resume(void)
/*
* HPET MSI on some boards (ATI SB700/SB800) has side effect on
* floppy DMA. Disable HPET MSI on such platforms.
+ *
+ * Also force the read back of the CMP register in hpet_next_event()
+ * to work around the problem that the CMP register write seems to be
+ * delayed. See hpet_next_event() for details.
*/
static void force_disable_hpet_msi(struct pci_dev *unused)
{
hpet_msi_disable = 1;
+ hpet_readback_cmp = 1;
}
DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ATI, PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_SBX00_SMBUS,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-29 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-24 23:37 2.6.33: Problem continues: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c:404 hpet_next_event+0x70/0x80 Justin Piszcz
2010-02-25 14:03 ` Thomas Backlund
2010-02-25 14:22 ` Justin Piszcz
2010-02-25 18:53 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2010-02-25 20:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-01 22:58 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, hpet: Erratum workaround for read after write of HPET comparator tip-bot for Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2010-04-29 1:36 ` tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-30a564be9d9554c168a654eddc2165869cc0d7bf@git.kernel.org \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox