From: tip-bot for Sisir Koppaka <sisir.koppaka@gmail.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
sisir.koppaka@gmail.com
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix rebalance interval calculation
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:40:39 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-3436ae1298cb22d722a6520fc97f112dd767a9e1@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikqHWid2Q93F5U5Qw5snJH8C5PXoa7J6=6hYO94@mail.gmail.com>
Commit-ID: 3436ae1298cb22d722a6520fc97f112dd767a9e1
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3436ae1298cb22d722a6520fc97f112dd767a9e1
Author: Sisir Koppaka <sisir.koppaka@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 18:22:55 +0530
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:00:37 +0200
sched: Fix rebalance interval calculation
The interval for checking scheduling domains if they are due to be
balanced currently depends on boot state NR_CPUS, which may not
accurately reflect the number of online CPUs at the time of check.
Thus replace NR_CPUS with num_online_cpus().
(ed: Should only affect those who set NR_CPUS really high, such as 4096
or so :-)
Signed-off-by: Sisir Koppaka <sisir.koppaka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <AANLkTikqHWid2Q93F5U5Qw5snJH8C5PXoa7J6=6hYO94@mail.gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 3f7ec9e..c7ec5c8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#include <linux/latencytop.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
/*
* Targeted preemption latency for CPU-bound tasks:
@@ -3850,8 +3851,8 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
interval = msecs_to_jiffies(interval);
if (unlikely(!interval))
interval = 1;
- if (interval > HZ*NR_CPUS/10)
- interval = HZ*NR_CPUS/10;
+ if (interval > HZ*num_online_cpus()/10)
+ interval = HZ*num_online_cpus()/10;
need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-31 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-26 12:52 [PATCH] sched: Replace NR_CPUS with num_online_cpus() Sisir Koppaka
2011-03-31 12:40 ` tip-bot for Sisir Koppaka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-3436ae1298cb22d722a6520fc97f112dd767a9e1@git.kernel.org \
--to=sisir.koppaka@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).