From: tip-bot for Jakub Jelen <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, jjelen@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
hpa@zytor.com, jakuje@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, acme@redhat.com,
mingo@kernel.org
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf bench numa: Fix assertion for nodes bitfield
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 00:37:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-3c52b658b8e4fbbf7975932bbdc4798421dbcb15@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458388687-24421-1-git-send-email-jakuje@gmail.com>
Commit-ID: 3c52b658b8e4fbbf7975932bbdc4798421dbcb15
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3c52b658b8e4fbbf7975932bbdc4798421dbcb15
Author: Jakub Jelen <jakuje@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 12:58:07 +0100
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:46:57 -0300
perf bench numa: Fix assertion for nodes bitfield
Comparing bits and bytes in numa benchmark assertion
I hit the issue on two socket Power8 machine presenting its numa nodes
as 0,1,16,17 (according to numactl). Therefore I got error (and hang of
parent process):
perf: bench/numa.c:296: bind_to_memnode: Assertion `!(g->p.nr_nodes > (int)sizeof(nodemask))' failed.
This is obviously false positive. We can fit all the 18 nodes into
bitfield of 8 bytes (long on 64b architecture).
Signed-off-by: Jakub Jelen <jakuje@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelen <jjelen@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: trivial@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1458388687-24421-1-git-send-email-jakuje@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
index 5049d63..7500d95 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static void bind_to_memnode(int node)
if (node == -1)
return;
- BUG_ON(g->p.nr_nodes > (int)sizeof(nodemask));
+ BUG_ON(g->p.nr_nodes > (int)sizeof(nodemask)*8);
nodemask = 1L << node;
ret = set_mempolicy(MPOL_BIND, &nodemask, sizeof(nodemask)*8);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-24 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-19 11:58 [PATCH] perf bench numa: Fix assertion for nodes bitfield Jakub Jelen
2016-03-21 20:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-03-24 7:37 ` tip-bot for Jakub Jelen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-3c52b658b8e4fbbf7975932bbdc4798421dbcb15@git.kernel.org \
--to=tipbot@zytor.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jakuje@gmail.com \
--cc=jjelen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox