From: "tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:core/urgent] rcu: Fix thinko, actually initialize full tree
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:59:05 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-49e291266d0920264471d9d64268fb030e33a99a@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <125329262011-git-send-email->
Commit-ID: 49e291266d0920264471d9d64268fb030e33a99a
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/49e291266d0920264471d9d64268fb030e33a99a
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:50:19 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 08:53:21 +0200
rcu: Fix thinko, actually initialize full tree
Commit de078d8 ("rcu: Need to update rnp->gpnum if preemptable RCU
is to be reliable") repeatedly and incorrectly initializes the root
rcu_node structure's ->gpnum field rather than initializing the
->gpnum field of each node in the tree. Fix this. Also add an
additional consistency check to catch this in the future.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@in.ibm.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@us.ibm.com
Cc: niv@us.ibm.com
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
LKML-Reference: <125329262011-git-send-email->
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 11 ++++-------
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index ae4a553..1b32cdd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -601,8 +601,6 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = rsp->rda[smp_processor_id()];
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
- struct rcu_node *rnp_cur;
- struct rcu_node *rnp_end;
if (!cpu_needs_another_gp(rsp, rdp)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
@@ -659,13 +657,12 @@ rcu_start_gp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
* one corresponding to this CPU, due to the fact that we have
* irqs disabled.
*/
- rnp_end = &rsp->node[NUM_RCU_NODES];
- for (rnp_cur = &rsp->node[0]; rnp_cur < rnp_end; rnp_cur++) {
- spin_lock(&rnp_cur->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+ for (rnp = &rsp->node[0]; rnp < &rsp->node[NUM_RCU_NODES]; rnp++) {
+ spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
- rnp_cur->qsmask = rnp_cur->qsmaskinit;
+ rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
- spin_unlock(&rnp_cur->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+ spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
}
rsp->signaled = RCU_SIGNAL_INIT; /* force_quiescent_state now OK. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index cd6047c..09b7325 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -476,10 +476,12 @@ static void rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
/*
* Because there is no preemptable RCU, there can be no readers blocked,
- * so there is no need to check for blocked tasks.
+ * so there is no need to check for blocked tasks. So check only for
+ * bogus qsmask values.
*/
static void rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(struct rcu_node *rnp)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->qsmask);
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-19 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-18 16:49 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] Cleanups/bugfixes for large systems and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-18 16:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] Add WARN_ON_ONCE() consistency checks covering state transitions Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-19 7:58 ` [tip:core/urgent] rcu: " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-18 16:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] Apply results of code inspection of kernel/rcutree_plugin.h Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-18 16:58 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-18 17:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <1253293408.7060.47.camel@desktop>
2009-09-18 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-18 17:08 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-18 17:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-18 17:56 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-19 7:58 ` [tip:core/urgent] rcu: " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-18 16:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] Fix thinko in commit #de078d875, actually initialize full tree Paul E. McKenney
2009-09-19 7:59 ` tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2009-09-19 6:55 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] Cleanups/bugfixes for large systems and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-49e291266d0920264471d9d64268fb030e33a99a@git.kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox